Results 1 to 27 of 27

Thread: ATTN: Photography Experts!

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    "She massages Shit" Mike Lowrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    I don't know, ask Bob.
    Age
    50
    Posts
    8,349
    Rep Power
    32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imbosile
    I would say go with lenses A and C, right now I only have a 70-300, and a 50mm. Trust me, you will feel really limited not having that lower range.
    Are those good choices or are there other lenses I should consider for the money?
    Rich...Bob...Stan...?????

  2. #2
    Proud to be Retrosexual Jaimecbr900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,189
    Rep Power
    38

    Default

    You will get more use on a day to day basis out of the 24-70 lens. The 70-200 2.8's are usually good lenses. The L lenses are the best of them all, but are very expensive. I shot with Joey's once, and I was hooked. Got me one right away. It's a great lens for outdoor sports. It won't work so well for like an indoor show though. You can also use the kit 18-55, which is so-so, and spend your money on a combo of big zoom and 50mm 1.8 or better prime.

    I'll show you my stuff on Sunday if you want.

  3. #3
    "She massages Shit" Mike Lowrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    I don't know, ask Bob.
    Age
    50
    Posts
    8,349
    Rep Power
    32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
    You will get more use on a day to day basis out of the 24-70 lens. The 70-200 2.8's are usually good lenses. The L lenses are the best of them all, but are very expensive. I shot with Joey's once, and I was hooked. Got me one right away. It's a great lens for outdoor sports. It won't work so well for like an indoor show though. You can also use the kit 18-55, which is so-so, and spend your money on a combo of big zoom and 50mm 1.8 or better prime.

    I'll show you my stuff on Sunday if you want.

    Cool. Thank Jaime!
    Rich...Bob...Stan...?????

  4. #4
    "She massages Shit" Mike Lowrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    I don't know, ask Bob.
    Age
    50
    Posts
    8,349
    Rep Power
    32

    Default

    Found another lens that looks interesting.

    Canon Zoom Telephoto EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM Autofocus Lens ($557)


    Which would you rather have?

    Canon Zoom Telephoto EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM Autofocus Lens ($557)
    or
    Sigma Zoom Telephoto 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG APO Macro HSM Autofocus Lens ($889)


    I am thinking of pairing one of the above lenses with this one to start:

    Sigma Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro DF Autofocus Lens ($429)


    Thoughts? Suggestions?
    Rich...Bob...Stan...?????

  5. #5
    www.s3mag.com CodyW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Atlanta
    Age
    42
    Posts
    513
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by richw131
    Found another lens that looks interesting.

    Canon Zoom Telephoto EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM Autofocus Lens ($557)


    Which would you rather have?

    Canon Zoom Telephoto EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM Autofocus Lens ($557)
    or
    Sigma Zoom Telephoto 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG APO Macro HSM Autofocus Lens ($889)


    I am thinking of pairing one of the above lenses with this one to start:

    Sigma Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro DF Autofocus Lens ($429)


    Thoughts? Suggestions?
    i had the same debate a while back and ended up getting the canon F4L, and i've been really happy with it (plus, canon was running a really good rebate deal at the time which made it too hard to pass up).

  6. #6
    "She massages Shit" Mike Lowrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    I don't know, ask Bob.
    Age
    50
    Posts
    8,349
    Rep Power
    32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CodyW
    i had the same debate a while back and ended up getting the canon F4L, and i've been really happy with it (plus, canon was running a really good rebate deal at the time which made it too hard to pass up).
    I am leaning towards the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L Lens ($557). How much will I miss without the IS. The IS version is like 3x the cost. Is it worth it?
    Rich...Bob...Stan...?????

  7. #7
    www.jasontbarker.com speedminded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    22,589
    Rep Power
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by richw131
    I am leaning towards the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L Lens ($557). How much will I miss without the IS. The IS version is like 3x the cost. Is it worth it?
    depends what you're shooting....if you're doing cars around a track i wouldn't worry about it too much. For the cost of the f/4.0 IS you could get a f/2.8 non-IS.

  8. #8
    Autogragic Money pit HachiDori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    41
    Posts
    4,816
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    I'll show you my stuff on Sunday if you want. [/QUOTE] LMAO
    sorry i had too. btw: i still have my stock shitty lense kit. doh'

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!