Gospel of Judas

[blacknightteg]

although this does bring up some interesting points and stories and what have you. keep in mind its clamed as a Gnostic gospel, meaning its not one of the gospels that the church associates with. the copy that was found apparently wasnt even the "orginial" doctorine that was written, apparently like most of the gospels, especially the gnostic ones, they were all written a good sum of years after the death of jesus. this gospel that was found is no differnet.

[Hulud]

although this does bring up some interesting points and stories and what have you. keep in mind its clamed as a Gnostic gospel, meaning its not one of the gospels that the church associates with. the copy that was found apparently wasnt even the "orginial" doctorine that was written, apparently like most of the gospels, especially the gnostic ones, they were all written a good sum of years after the death of jesus. this gospel that was found is no differnet.

so what your saying is that because the church doesnt associate with it, its wrong?

maybe the church doesnt associate with it because it doesnt fit this nice little story they preach? food for thought