He's a scientist, and has come to a conclusion based on evidence. You've seemed to want to oppose the scientific method and want to make a false conclusion, and then find evidence to support that. Why do you believe this is the correct way to approach a problem, and that the entire scientific community is approaching it in the wrong way?Islams goal is world domination? Do you have evidence for that? Is that written in any text anywhere?but Islamic terrorism has a political presence too. Islam's goal is world domination. They are very active in the political arena. Egypt is currently in the process of removing muslim terrorists from their government.
Pape says he's analyzed over 300 significant events and has come to that conclusion.I've love for you to lay out some examples of terrorism acted out by a muslim that was based on a political belief and not a religious one.The idea sounds ridiculous.I dont think theres a single argument in favor of islam in this thread. Just a bunch of arguments against your false assumtions.So far every argument produced in favor is islam is a turn the blind eye denial of what happens on behalf of Islam.
Do you have evidence of them screaming this? I don't ever think I've heard that before. Of course, I've never been in a place where a building has been blown up, so I've never been within earshot of that.When a terrorist blows up a building while screaming "ALLAH ALLAH ALLAH ISLAM WILL DOMINATE THE WORLD"