Quote Originally Posted by geoff View Post
I don't think you could have missed the purpose of my original statement any more than you have already. Dawkins is a scientist that uses such science and the theory of evolution to mock the belief in a God. That is biased. Any scientist who uses science to disprove/prove God is bias. That is the point, science is supposed to be unbiased and objective. Dawkins by his own mouth and actions makes his point invalid.
He doesn't use evolution to mock god. He uses logical fallacies in the bible to mock god.

Intelligent Design is not a theory by the way, it's a conjecture