Evolutionist's.....care to discuss?

[geoff]

Story about evolution > story about a god creating the world in 7 days

The only thing i find compelling in the evolution theory is .....adaptation. Adaptation is something you don't have to be a scientist to observe. So what you are telling me is that this theory, which relies completely on chance, and can not even begin to describe where it came from or what was the cause that put it into motion is more believable than intelligent design or that God created everything? The theory of evolution is an effect that can not point out its cause...goes against the law of causality.

When you talk about God being responsible for it all, you have to consider a few things. For one, there are evidences that point to intent and design ( the same evidences used to describe evolution). In order for a being to literally take nothing and then create every form of matter and natural law, that said being would have to be eternal and infinite to create a finite universe. This being would have to be not bound by space and time and be above every known physical law of nature. So, how can we being finite and bound by laws and relatively new to this planet ( some 6000years since writing and civilization) expect to be able to explain this God? Now, we have evidence supporting design, we have a cause for the effect, and honestly there is only a 50% chance that He did or didn't do it. Now, logically, how is evolution more probable? Or are we the general populous being fed a theory that is very improbable?

Remember this, not too long ago the entire scientific/philosophical community swore that the world was flat and that it was the center of the universe. I'm sure just as today, the theory was changed numerous times to "fit" in. This theory today is considered false and if you still believed it you would be ridiculous. So how many times does this current theory of evolution have to be "tweaked" before it to is found to be improbable or ridiculous.

Go watch the series called " The God Delusion" on youtube and please tell me what Richard Dawkins purpose is. Evolution has been abandoned as a science and has become propaganda to further the atheistic cause.

[bu villain]

Go watch the series called " The God Delusion" on youtube and please tell me what Richard Dawkins purpose is. Evolution has been abandoned as a science and has become propaganda to further the atheistic cause.

I've read the book by the same name, is that sufficient? His purpose is to explain why its illogical to believe in God, not that it is impossible for God to exist.

[RL...]

The only thing i find compelling in the evolution theory is .....adaptation. Adaptation is something you don't have to be a scientist to observe. So what you are telling me is that this theory, which relies completely on chance, and can not even begin to describe where it came from or what was the cause that put it into motion is more believable than intelligent design or that God created everything? The theory of evolution is an effect that can not point out its cause...goes against the law of causality.

When you talk about God being responsible for it all, you have to consider a few things. For one, there are evidences that point to intent and design ( the same evidences used to describe evolution). In order for a being to literally take nothing and then create every form of matter and natural law, that said being would have to be eternal and infinite to create a finite universe. This being would have to be not bound by space and time and be above every known physical law of nature. So, how can we being finite and bound by laws and relatively new to this planet ( some 6000years since writing and civilization) expect to be able to explain this God? Now, we have evidence supporting design, we have a cause for the effect, and honestly there is only a 50% chance that He did or didn't do it. Now, logically, how is evolution more probable? Or are we the general populous being fed a theory that is very improbable?

Remember this, not too long ago the entire scientific/philosophical community swore that the world was flat and that it was the center of the universe. I'm sure just as today, the theory was changed numerous times to "fit" in. This theory today is considered false and if you still believed it you would be ridiculous. So how many times does this current theory of evolution have to be "tweaked" before it to is found to be improbable or ridiculous.

Go watch the series called " The God Delusion" on youtube and please tell me what Richard Dawkins purpose is. Evolution has been abandoned as a science and has become propaganda to further the atheistic cause.

You say the theory of evolution is based on chance. Perhaps, but the idea of religion is based on pure faith, there is nothing scientific at all about it. And I'd take chance over blind faith any day.