Evolution is not scientific Fact my friends, other wise it would be "scientific LAW" much like gravity. There are parts that are factual and parts that cannot be observed...i.e. "macro-evolution". Im not saying evolution is a lie, im saying that it itself in no way shape or form replaces nor explains God or the origin of life.
Now ofcourse the Bible translation has changed, its been translated into english, spanish, italian, ect......BUT the message of salvation echoed throughout it has not changed. How do I know this? Ancient manuscripts dating thousands of years old written way before the first " official" canonized Bible that was commissioned a few centuries even after the time of the apostles and Jesus. Then you have writings not only of the apostles and their disciples but of other roman, greek, and jewish scholars that were actually threatened by the " Jesus movement ". The government at the time thought of this movement as a rebellion and did its best to try and crush it...or do you doubt the history books that detail this as the Roman persecution of Christians? They saw that they could not destroy it, so they followed the basic idea of " if you can't beat them, join them". But what they did was to change the application of the bible. They gave themselves divine authority in the form of a "pope" and appointed "bishops". It was not the message that was corrupt but the application. Much like the government in the United States. The Constitution is no longer seen as literally to be followed but rather in the " spirit of the message" in which case amendments can be made by men today ( not the founding fathers) as to what still applies and what does not. Does that make the Constitution then invalid?





Reply With Quote



