Faith and how it relates to religion and science

[bu villain]

1) that list sucks, and I am not going to explain why

Ok, simple enough.

2) The fact that I am looking at a computer monitor as I type this is not only happening I can proce this to be happening. This is reality. And the reason why this does not require faith, is because if I asked anyone is the world what I am doing right now, they would say the same thing. They would say I am sitting at a desktop looking at a computer screen. As such, since everyone would be able to come to this conclusion, it can be deemed reality. Reality means "the state of things as they actually exist" and if something actually exists and can be proven than I do not see how that requires belief or faith. It is simply, fact.

I guess you've never heard of ontology. With science, everyone should be able to come to the same conclusion. Just because most people aren't willing to take the time to learn about a theory and the reasons for it doesn't make it a bad theory.

Basically, you're telling me that if I were to hit you in the face with a baseball bat, it requires faith to believe that you're feeling pain? I think it would be pretty damn obvious.

Actually I would argue the opposite. I just thought using your interpretation of "faith" would lead to thinking that believing anything requires faith. I guess I don't understand where you draw the line for what's faith and what's not. We can't see, touch, taste, hear, or smell radio waves. Are you saying that our faith in radio waves is the same as faith in religion? If not, was it the same until someone actually built a radio?