Okay...Originally Posted by d993s
BTW this is probably your funniest post yet.
Geoff, in arguments of debate and proof, he is 100% right. ***edit*** about using the document to prove itself.Please stop using a document to prove itself. The only place the bible makes sense is in the bible... do you not think that there is something wrong w/ that?
But, I can't agree on the only place it makes sense is within itself.
Baby J
His statements are even true philosophically and psychologically and socially and they make perfect sense. The Bible and these social sciences are only validating one another. As I believe they have to.
psychologically a person who chooses to reject belief in anything can make reasons up or ignore evidence to believe. and on this topic, seeing as how I believe that ALL things come from God, as he created the universe, and directed all laws to govern it, nothing is suitable enough to prove his existence because my world view is that ALL things presuppose his existence because they have to. Basically what you said married with, I believe in a God who created ALL things. And you and I know there is a difference between proof and evidence.
for those who don't understand this. Our courts system works on an abundance of evidence to prove something. So evidence is intent or motivation for the crime, fingerprints, witness testimony, etc etc, and a compilation of evidence can be interpreted as proof. we have all seen the evidence, philosophically it can't be called proof, until the individual decides that the case is made.




Reply With Quote