Originally Posted by
sport_122
My personal beliefs based on evidence. If you believe in anything related to science it is based off of evidence. You believe your car will start in the morning, thats why you will not call a friend and ask for a ride to work. And yes, I elaborated, but as you can see in my last post, proof doesn't exist for those who are looking to dismiss it, it can't. Even before you ask for proof, your intent is to dismiss whatever comes out, to find a way to make the argument NOT work for your POV. So why do you ask for proof? Do you believe proof exists? If you don't why ask for it or harp on it when it is presented. I gave reason for my beliefs. Thats all I need to do. You have no real response to the reasons. All that you have is YOUR personal bias to argue because you have not studied or read of looked at the authors that I have read. I have read books by atheists, non-theists, and theists alike, and I do not agree with All of any of them, yet I have enough information to make a reasonable statement of my faith. You have nothing, but attacks on my beliefs as if you know me and know what I have been through or my experience with and before I came to faith.
The reason you will NOT be satisfied with evidence or reason to believe right now is that in your heart you don't want it. You can argue against just about anything that you want (and almost everything).
Reply With Quote