Do you believe in God? Simple question

[StreetHazard]

buvillian- there is no scientific proof or fact that there is one God or any God. there are theories though of why there would only be one creative being or entity that would be known as God. if your interested i could elaborate on the theory, since there is no tangible proof of a creator.

i find it interesting to say the least that you streethazard put a list about as long as my forearm of names that support or argue the THEORY of evolutionary synthesis. 50 years ago that list would of been full of different names supporting a different THEORY of evolution. as far as that goes my point is this, ANY form of evolution is still just a THEORY NOT FACT and along with what ahabion is saying will always change or be tweeked to match what new finds are made.

definition of SCIENTIFIC FACT: any observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and accepted as true; any scientific observation that has not been refuted

Example: The structure of a cell membrane is considered a scientific fact.

so in that sense the idea of ANY form of evolution is not scientific fact but theory because it will always be refuted due to a new observation or finding. so in all reality your accepted theories of the big bang and evolution are no more factual or truth than my own accepted theory of God. your trust and faith is in men that dedicate their lives to science whereas my faith and trust is in Jesus, His apostles, and my bible.

Can you prove your theory of god in a court of law or utilizing the scientific method? I am sure the world would like to read it, and myself included, preferably written in "layman's terms" so to speak to avoid confusion.

again...for the 2nd time, you are almost as bad as (Ahabion)

I will quote a chapter conclusion in that press release here.

"Creationism, intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science. These claims subordinate observed data to statements based on authority, revelation, or religious belief. Documentation offered in support of these claims is typically limited to the special publications of their advocates. These publications do not offer hypotheses subject to change in light of new data, new interpretations, or demonstration of error. This contrasts with science, where any hypothesis or theory always remains subject to the possibility of rejection or modification in the light of new knowledge."

If the National Academy of Science found your data to be factually TRUE then they would have to revise their stance and theory, so far this has not happened. But I would very much like to see your theory and if you feel that it is iron clad you can email or call this man.

Jay Labov
Senior Advisor for Education and Communications
The National Academies

202-334-1458

[email protected]


Please do not disappoint me Geoff, here is your chance to shine and show the world the glory of God and prove that (it) is the sole mover of the universe. It would be so cool to be one of the 1st people to see it publicly!