Quote Originally Posted by Ronsam2006

It's like asking, "Who would you trust, person A who has been PROVEN to be 99.9% accurate or person B that CLAIMS to be 100% accurate? Person A is science and is right 99.9% and that .1 that he is off by is the margin of error. Person B is religion. Again this is all my opinion.
QFT. It's a dangerous man who thinks that his knowledge is absolute beyond the point of accepting or even considering other ideas. This man (and his ideas/stance) is even MORE dangerous w/out an OUNCE of "proof", or w/ "proof" that's not even remotely solid. Science allows the potential to be proven wrong when INTELLECTUALLY challenged w/ sound observation - this is an arbitrary process. Religion does not allow for this... they have "arrived" to the absolute --- that's a SLICK SLOPE to base your life/kids and 10% of your income to every Sunday... especially when you use a handed down document to prove itself. Anytime you use a document to prove itself you're slow-dancing w/ a cult.