I answered your question, twice, (refer to your statement on believers being unwilling to learn). This is your chance to TEACH me.Originally Posted by BABY J
In the true fashion of someone who is "close minded" and unwilling to LEARN, you ignored my question again (I thought I, the believer, was supposed to do that). You may be older than me but you don't seem to know as much as you think. Even the very nature of our current economy shows that people who are not physically in front of you can have a personal effect on you, that is so elementary. If you are going to ask a question of me then you should be able to answer on your own grounds as well.
so why don't you tell me what any scientist, or anyone has done for you personally? The truth is that MOST of our influences stem from things that we DO NOT have a personal contact with. Things you read, things you see on TV, things on the internet and technology. For you to say "That's what I thought" means that you can answer that question. If you can't your argument is fail and that goes to show you are just talking and have really put no thought into the statement you made to me. None of your statements have validity to me unless you can do that. I would even settle for you being able to make a valid comment with support on anything I said in my past two posts instead of ignoring the discussion and not proving any point at all.