That video seemed pretty biased. I know gun magazines are 100% biased. But i will summerize the article i mentioned. They compared the two guns on 10 topics, one point for each topic for the winner. Here ya go. let me know what you think. My opinions stands: both weapons have a place and purpose and they dont neccesarily overlap.

RECEIVER VERSATILITY: 1point AR 1 point AK

BUTTSTOCK ERGONOMICS: AR 1 point

OPTICAL SIGHT SUITABILITY: AR 1 point

RAIL ACCESSORY INTERFACE: AR 1 point

STANDARD BALLISTICS: AK 1 point

COMBAT RELIABILITY: AK 1 point

LONG RANGE ACCURACY: AR 1 point

GRENADE LAUCHING: AR 1 point

ERGONOMIC FACTORS: AR 1 point

REMEDIAL ACTION DRILLS: AR 1 point AK 1 point

FINAL SCORE: 8 to 4, AR Winner.

I found these hard to argue with. If you have some more topics to add we can debate those but these 10 are basically set in stone and i think most would agree to that.