as i stated before i have never read and i just saw a discussion on pbs about this subject and historians/theologist from every major university agree that there is no REAL roman records indicating that the happens as in the bible w/ jesus ever took place. i don't know what link or proof your talking about b/c i have yet to read about any real roman documents that exsist that speak of jesus... even at the same time not all christians believed in jesus... they believed in GOD but not jesus... that is why constantine brought christianity together as one set of beliefs. so if one man decided what was right and what was wrong before the bible was written how do you know these artifacts (bible) are even true... you are reading what was compiled by one MAN, so believe what you want i guessOriginally Posted by Jaimecbr900
well they do have execution documentation dating back to jesus, so it is not out of the question that he should be in there as well, but he is not. and it wouldn't matter to them anyway if he was crazy or not... the only way he would of been executed like many of christians were was if he declined to worship and take part in rituals for the gods.I would also question: Why would the romans WRITE about it? Name me ANYBODY that has been executed in recent years for claiming to be the son of God, and charged with blasphemy etc etc.. and has been "written" about? It is not written about today, 10 years ago, 100 years ago or in that time. Surely thousands were executed during witch trials, religious persecussions etc, but they would definitely not name them one by one.
now to further this... constantine made christianity what it is today so if jesus exsisted and he believed in him than constantine would of made sure it was put into roman doctrine... shit constantine was credited w/ making the cross the religious symbol for christianity. so why isn't jesus in any roman records???





Reply With Quote