Condo vs. House?

[civic95]

There are a lot of nice houses around. What is your price range? maybe thats the problem. Condos are cheaper than a house because you have no land. Really it depends on how you look at it. The association fee on a condo or townhouse is way more than a house usually. So a 170K condo vs: 190K house may not really be cheaper in the long run. Houses are like cars. Some people don't take care of them, and others do. The only reason condos are appearing nicer is because it takes the owner out of the equation. The HOA pays for someone to paint, landscape, spray for bugs, etc and they make sure its done on a schedule.

Which one is better? Its all personal preference. If you don't like to do things yourself or don't have a lot of free time a condo is probably better. If you don't mind doing things yourself to save money, enjoy having your own land, and want some kind of privacy get a house.

[Jaimecbr900]

It may be because you are looking in the wrong place or with the wrong person.

I have been in Real Estate for a long time. I have seen some dog shacks and I've seen mansions. To be honest, the vast majority of homes you see have some minor imperfections here and there (even new homes) but it's not anything major. Condos seem better taken care of because of what Civic95 said, the HOA takes care of all the outside stuff.

Again, to be honest I've seen homes in other states and I'd much rather live here than there. As far as I've personally seen, we get a lot for our dollar here. I've seen homes in Cali, Nevada, Texas, etc. where $500k barely gets you a decent house where here it can get you a mansion. Then you start looking and you get almost no property, shoddy construction, and pay outrageous amounts of money for taxes.