God vs. Science

[qwick]

No one has been able to show a species evolve to another species[/size], and current genetic understanding expressly negates the possibility.

There are many instances where the" family tree” of a species splits and becomes a seemingly different type of species thus giving rise to the term “a close cousin” where referring to similar species that came from the same ancestor took different “path of evolution” caused by differences in habitat, climate or a number of other reasons. An example would be dinosaurs. Dinosaurs were more closely related to reptiles, and it has been shown that the “family tree” split and gave rise to modern day reptiles and birds.

[David88vert]

There are many instances where the" family tree” of a species splits and becomes a seemingly different type of species thus giving rise to the term “a close cousin” where referring to similar species that came from the same ancestor took different “path of evolution” caused by differences in habitat, climate or a number of other reasons. An example would be dinosaurs. Dinosaurs were more closely related to reptiles, and it has been shown that the “family tree” split and gave rise to modern day reptiles and birds.

No scientist has been able to show a proveable genetic path between two species. Family tree splits have been speculation only. Genetic proof has not been shown.

Let me guess, you have been reading EvilBible.

[qwick]

No scientist has been able to show a proveable genetic path between two species. Family tree splits have been speculation only. Genetic proof has not been shown.

Let me guess, you have been reading EvilBible.

There is significant evidence that some species of Raptors evolved over time to have both scales and feathers, and that as these species moved to different areas the scales or feathers became a more and more dominate trait. In fact fossils have been found where the animal was completely covered in feathers and some of the bones interior were porous while a few hundred miles away the same species was found with only scales and a sold bone interior. This evidence alone supports the theory that some dinosaurs evolved to both birds and reptiles.



No I have never read EvilBible but I was told it is interesting, Your opinion on the book?

[David88vert]

There is significant evidence that some species of Raptors evolved over time to have both scales and feathers, and that as these species moved to different areas the scales or feathers became a more and more dominate trait. In fact fossils have been found where the animal was completely covered in feathers and some of the bones interior were porous while a few hundred miles away the same species was found with only scales and a sold bone interior. This evidence alone supports the theory that some dinosaurs evolved to both birds and reptiles.

Speculation. Please show the research supporting this.

No I have never read EvilBible but I was told it is interesting, Your opinion on the book?

evilbible.com is a site.