God vs. Science

[The12lber]

"Similar confusion is involved in objections that evolution is "unproven";[20] strict proof is possible only in logic and mathematics, not science, so this is trivially true, and no more an indictment of evolution than calling it a "theory" is. The confusion arises, however, in that the colloquial meaning of proof is simply "compelling evidence", in which case scientists would indeed consider evolution "proven". The distinction is an important one in philosophy of science, as it relates to the lack of absolute certainty in all empirical claims, not just evolution. "

Your precious wikipedia has betrayed you

Actually, it basically said that all fields of science are without completely definite truth but scientists consider evolution as good as factual and are as certain as they can be. Just as certain as they can be about anything else. You know, like, the science behind the electrical engineering which created the computer you're using right now. They're not totally 100% all of that is factual. The bible says that god only created volatile storage mediums and not non volatile storage mediums like your hard drive... and that thing isn't working is it? OH WAIT, IT IS!?

You even bolded the part that illustrates this best.

IF ONLY YOU COULD UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU READ.