God there are some stupid ass people on this forum. All you who think it's LOSE, DIAF.
God there are some stupid ass people on this forum. All you who think it's LOSE, DIAF.
for the ross?
![]()
no.. for teh ross![]()
LOFAILOriginally Posted by GKtib®
you guys are certainly upping the anty on your douchebaggery today.
Is this a compliment coming from King Douchey himself?Originally Posted by GKtib®
i'm walking the line between being appalled or impressed.
...you're gay.
I always used it as For Tha Lame
correction:Originally Posted by GKtib®
for the ross...
![]()
***** FTL For the Loss
**** FTL For the Lose
loss has more stars
so it wins
...kthx
NIKON Squad | D90
i second this motionOriginally Posted by GKtib®
Val for President
I love old threads!!! They were so great!!! Even stupid sh*t like this!!
BeFF <beef>
GECKOSQUAD
thats enough out of you joselynOriginally Posted by SLOWLYbtngU
Val for President
I speaketh the truth!!!! And you know it... I jsut dont want to be wack and make another IA aint what it used to be thread...Originally Posted by Hulud
BeFF <beef>
GECKOSQUAD
Originally Posted by Urban Dictionary
![]()
lolOriginally Posted by SLOWLYbtngU
you do speak the truth, even with this post
Val for President
look at your sourceOriginally Posted by Ran
![]()
Val for President
Well...Originally Posted by Hulud
However, considering that "For The Lose" has more backing, I think it comes out on top.Originally Posted by Wikipedia
http://www.forthelose.com/
It has it's own f*cking website. I win. GTFO
that still doesnt change the fact that you all are grammatically challenged and don't know what you're talkng about lolOriginally Posted by Ran
Val for President
I'm grammactically challenged? It's a phrase being used in a future context.Originally Posted by Hulud
For The Win = As in, "Going to Win"
For The Lose = As in, "Going to Lose"
"Going to Loss"? I think not. STFU
You two are my only source of entertainment right now.
BeFF <beef>
GECKOSQUAD
Are you actually modding your Civic? I thought you hated it!Originally Posted by SLOWLYbtngU
![]()
no For The Loss is a completely different structured sentence than Going to LoseOriginally Posted by Ran
so your logic there is flawed
Val for President
No it's not. It's the exact opposite of "For The Win" which is structured in the way I defined. It's purpose, structure, and intent are identical to the examples I compared them to.Originally Posted by Hulud
Come on now Hulud, I know it's hard to admit that you're wrong sometimes, but you've really no supporting argument.![]()
naw its not hard for me to admit it, do it all the time actually.Originally Posted by Ran
but how are you gonna say that "Going to lose" is gramatically the same sentence as "For the loss"
you need a noun. loss is the noun that makes the sentence gramatically correct.
lose is a verb, so its not gramatically correct.
now you gtfo kthxbye![]()
Val for President
It's a slang. In the end, grammatical corrections are irrelevant to their purpose. The "Win" in FTW is being used as a verb, not a noun. Just like in the line "Going To Win". Therefore, considering that FTL is the EXACT OPPOSITE of FTW, it too is to be used in it's verb form.Originally Posted by Hulud
Welcome to the internet.![]()
my whole point was that its not gramatically correct, thank youOriginally Posted by Ran
![]()
Val for President
Okay, I'll grant you that. The term "FTL" is not grammatically correct. However, that doesn't change what it actually stands for.Originally Posted by Hulud
FTL = For The Lose
![]()
so do you say "for the lose" irl?Originally Posted by Ran
Val for President
Sure, about as much as I say "laugh out loud"Originally Posted by Hulud
![]()
I did hate it...ANd then I fell in love with her...And then I fell in love with my pink rims that were stolen....and then I ordered some more...Originally Posted by Ran
![]()
BeFF <beef>
GECKOSQUAD