That is the first post that remotely resembles a coherent statement.Originally Posted by kendogg
You're absolutely correct. This is exactly what several people have tried to say several different times. Comparing an M3 to a G35 is NOT a fair comparison. Comparing an STI vs an M3 from a DIG is also not a fair comparison. ANY car can and sometimes is better than ANY other car given the right mix of circumstances. But to say that my BMW's shit don't stink merely because it's a BMW is stupid because shit is shit. It stinks regardless.
Your buddy wants to race at a track, fine. Road Atlanta is a track, but so is Commerce and SDR. Why is one track a track and the other not in his book??? Because he'd get his ass handed to him in one and not the other. That doesn't make his car the ultimate anything, except in one place. That's been the point all along.
I'd put my money on Matt's SE-R, or Val's Evo, or Matt's WRX, or Patrycja's Supra, or Turbo Dave's 240, or Charles' Evo, or a ton of other people's cars against MR. Dinan and his M3 in a host of races. Problem is your buddy only wants to race in the race HE thinks HE has the advantage in ONLY. Don't be a pussy if you wanna run your mouth.
The saying goes, "Run what you brung and hope you brung enough!". Not, "Run what I got in my backyard ONLY to make sure I don't get beat, so I can keep the fairy tale of the ultimate driving machine alive..."![]()





