I just can't believe the media would make a big deal of him saying shit, compared to all the shit he has caused
I just can't believe the media would make a big deal of him saying shit, compared to all the shit he has caused
2006 Evo IX - Bolt ons
Originally Posted by TIGERJC
they'll make a big deal out of anything
fucking liberals love doing thatOriginally Posted by imbosile
Yes! I'm very liberal but he's still a human and makes mistakes. One man lies about a BJ and gets impeached, the other lies about an entire war and gets re-elected . . .Originally Posted by TIGERJC
I wonder how his blindly faithful churchgoing supporters will like his foul language?
02 WRX Sport Wagon
Ermm... pretty sure Mr. BJ Clinton didn't get impeached, and actually served 2 full terms.Originally Posted by GTScoob
Yeah but they tried, failed, but tried none the lessOriginally Posted by HyPer50
BeFF <beef>
GECKOSQUAD
Hmmm, last time I checked it was ILLEGAL to LIE to a GRAND JURY when you are under investigation......is it not????Originally Posted by SLOWLYbtngU
How many GRAND JURYs has Bush lied to?????![]()
He got in trouble, NOT for the BJ, for LYING while under oath over and over and over again.
Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
Ahemm...Sorry. Here let me re-type my statement a little differently.
They tried. Failed, but tried none the less....
Was that an opinion? Was that a statement of anger? Oh wait, I think it is merely an observational statement declaring the obvious. K thx just wondering.
Ur looking for an argument. Here are my liberal statements of the day and I will then run to the bathroom and wash my mouth out w/ soap.
I would much rather have someone lie about getting head, then to have someone lie to me as to the reason why several of my friends are now dead from "friendly fire," about the reason's that we went to war, or picking a war with a country that has no affiliation with those that attacked America, other than geographical location. And yes granted u can give me the bullshit about at least now Saddam is out of power...greater good for Iraq...Blah blah blah....If people came here and did what we did to Iraq, and have done all over the world, we would be pissed.
OK I can't keep going. My heart hurts.
BeFF <beef>
GECKOSQUAD
Originally Posted by SLOWLYbtngU
Let me ask you something: What part are you most upset with? That they "tried" or that he LIED under oath?
Ironic isn't it? How you are putting the horse before the cart. If you or I lie to ANY court while under oath, what do you think would happen? What do you think the LAW says MUST happen? Why should the President be any different?
As a newbie here, you sure do have a chip on your shoulder when someone challenges your position on something. Is there a reason for that?Was that an opinion? Was that a statement of anger? Oh wait, I think it is merely an observational statement declaring the obvious. K thx just wondering.
Ur looking for an argument.
I do love a good debate, but I don't know you. So trust me, it's nothing personal at all.
Had Clinton had the balls to do what needed to be done, we wouldn't be in Iraq today. Go look it up and see how CLINTON had Ossamah AND Saddam literally dead in the cross hairs and he chickened out and didn't order them to pull the trigger. That was....ummmm.....a good many YEARS BEFORE 9/11. Why didn't he? Because he wanted to be POLITICALLY CORRECT and not upset another country. How's that worked out as a strategy now????I would much rather have someone lie about getting head, then to have someone lie to me as to the reason why several of my friends are now dead from "friendly fire,"![]()
So you are right about one thing: There are far worse things CLINTON did than getting a BJ.![]()
You wanna lay blame on people dying? Call your boy Clinton and ask him WHY when he had an UNMANED drone plane with a bomb on it and Ossamah in it's sights, did HE not ok to pull the trigger? How many INNOCENT people have now died as a direct result of that lack of action??????
Answer THAT and then I'll be happy to debate you on why Bush saying "shit" is an enormous joke of a story.![]()
about the reason's that we went to war, or picking a war with a country that has no affiliation with those that attacked America, other than geographical location.
Really? Is that the reason why Al-Keida's top brass were indeed found AND killed IN Iraq???? Why were they even there? Hmmmm.....maybe because they often traveled right thru IRAQ on their way to Afghanistan or other parts of the Middle East UNCHECKED and with the full knowledge of Saddam? Oh, wait, how were we supposed to chase Ossamah who was cowardly running into Afghanistan if not by going thru Iraq? Do you think if we'd asked Saddam nicely he'd let us bring our military into his country to chase down a terrorist? Maybe Saddam's thumbing his nose at the world and refusing to do what they had agreed to do when they SURRENDERED and called for MERCY was also to be overlooked. I mean it'd only been going on for what?.....10+ yrs???? That way we could show the entire known world how treaties are nothing more than toilet paper to wipe with. How do you think that will help when we have to deal with countries like N. Korea who now have NUCLEAR capabilities? When THEY sign a treaty to disarm, I guess the precedent set by Saddam would go over well then too, huh?
no he was impeached.Originally Posted by SLOWLYbtngU
-IA MGMT is inappropriate.
Impeached yes but no action taken.....Sorry I should have been clearer. Thank you!Originally Posted by Leadfoot_mf
"Although the impeachment process succeeded at the level of the House of Representatives, without the Senate's confirming action in this matter, no further action was taken."
BeFF <beef>
GECKOSQUAD
I <3 U! +1Originally Posted by GTScoob
BeFF <beef>
GECKOSQUAD
lirl +1 for youOriginally Posted by BluesClues
![]()
![]()
![]()
-IA MGMT is inappropriate.