Originally Posted by
CRAMERIZKING
Banning Dan, Tracy, or other members involved would be completely worthless. We're all entitled to our own individual and personal drama. However, since the group in question is an IA sponsor, I'd say there should be some form of diciplinary action in that respect.
Frankly, I could care less what led up to the varsity conflict, but that kind of public display is unacceptable. It looks bad for BG as well as IA for being associated with the name. The varsity is one of the few events we have left that draws so many enthusiasts in the atlanta area. Was a potential fist fight in the parking lot worth the risk of losing the varsity as a meet spot?
If i was running IA, I'd definetely consider some sort of probation system for BG. I wouldn't be suprised if i got flamed for it, but from what i've read, this is one of the few and proud constructive criticism posts in a sea of bullshit.
This is how i see it:
Let all of this drama go with the understanding that one more inappropriate outburst from BG would mean diciplinary action. The diciplinary action in this case being the temporary or permanent removal of BG advertisement from the IA website. (Which would go for ANY sponsor that creates an uncomfortable atmosphere at a public meet.)
SUMMARY FOR THE LAZY: Let it go for now... But... If something goes down again with battleground being the agressor in a public place... Then there would need to be further action by import atlanta.
on what should happen doesnt matter and neither does mine..why? because its the internet..you just said to let it go until an out burst by battle ground and then for ia to take action..you sir can remove yourself from this thread with your biased thinking...what about and outburst from will,does that not count in this case Hitler?
