DoD to release 9/11 video showing the Pentagon being hit

[Vteckidd]

I still believe the pentagon was hit by a plane. i have seen no evidence , regardless , that we hit it with a missle.

[Xan]

I still believe the pentagon was hit by a plane. i have seen no evidence , regardless , that we hit it with a missle.

+1. Maybe not the plane they say it was, but a plane none the less.

[Sport1.3]

well there really is no proof either way...the previous tapes showing impact definitly showed an object SMALLER than a plane hit the wall, but it was too fast to really tell. also the hole in the pentagon wall was way too small to be a 747.



shit links dont work.^^

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/..._evidence.html

[Ruiner]

well there really is no proof either way...the previous tapes showing impact definitly showed an object SMALLER than a plane hit the wall, but it was too fast to really tell. also the hole in the pentagon wall was way too small to be a 747.

Looks to be a 12-15ft hole to me....

A 757, not a 747...

The 757-200 dimensions:
Tail Height: 44 ft 6 in (13.6m)
Length: 155 ft 3 in (47.32m)
Wingspan: 124 ft 10 in (38.05m)
Body Exterior Width: 12 ft 4 in (3.7m)

[Sport1.3]

Looks to be a 12-15ft hole to me....

A 757, not a 747...

The 757-200 dimensions:
Tail Height: 44 ft 6 in (13.6m)
Length: 155 ft 3 in (47.32m)
Wingspan: 124 ft 10 in (38.05m)

you pretty much showed me right there it wasnt that type of plane.the tail and wings dont disappear on impact, or come off not leaving even a scratch on the brick wall. i can mark a brick wall with a bat and it couldnt traveling that fast? where were all the seats and the wings/tail? where was the black box??which was never found or submitted. where are the burn marks on the grass due to exterior impact on the outer walls of the pentagon, where were all the dead bodies supposedly on board, why was it that, that part of the building just happened to be under constructions and having minimal amount of casualities, how could the plane of flown so low to hit that low and not hit cars or light poles etc.......

[Ruiner]

how could the plane of flown so low to hit that low and not hit cars or light poles etc.......

Cars, light poles at your request:

The hit lightpoles, and damaged vehicles in the flightpath (click for larger images)

[Sport1.3]

Cars, light poles at your request:

The hit lightpoles, and damaged vehicles in the flightpath (click for larger images)

the links on all those pics keeps breaking.....ive seen the pics. they prove nothing. could all be results of the explosion after the object hit the pentagon. big question is where are all the bodies? the flight recorder (black box) would detail everything, why hasnt that been released to squelch all falsifying claims? where are all these outraged families that lost their loved ones? where is a list of the on board passengers that cant be found? still doesnt explain the no apparent burns or marking on the grass that a 757 would of had to make with an impact on a building? why did the "plane" hit the exact area of the pentagon that was under construction and void of any and all government workers when it had four other sides that could have seen the same damage? why if the pentagon is one of the most highly secured building in the US that we only have cameras that capture slow motion film, there are TONS of cameras around the entire perimeter of the building that are on constantly recording, where is that footage? where are these families that were really saying they got a phone call from their family member before the crash? etc.....ive got plenty more questions as well

[Ruiner]

the links on all those pics keeps breaking.....ive seen the pics. they prove nothing. could all be results of the explosion after the object hit the pentagon. big question is where are all the bodies? the flight recorder (black box) would detail everything, why hasnt that been released to squelch all falsifying claims? where are all these outraged families that lost their loved ones? where is a list of the on board passengers that cant be found? still doesnt explain the no apparent burns or marking on the grass that a 757 would of had to make with an impact on a building? why did the "plane" hit the exact area of the pentagon that was under construction and void of any and all government workers when it had four other sides that could have seen the same damage? why if the pentagon is one of the most highly secured building in the US that we only have cameras that capture slow motion film, there are TONS of cameras around the entire perimeter of the building that are on constantly recording, where is that footage? where are these families that were really saying they got a phone call from their family member before the crash? etc.....ive got plenty more questions as well

I personally have a friend that saw the plane fly low overhead and heard the boom. He didn't see the explosion, but you get the idea. There are HUNDREDS of these type of witnesses by the way.

[Brett]

you pretty much showed me right there it wasnt that type of plane.the tail and wings dont disappear on impact, or come off not leaving even a scratch on the brick wall. i can mark a brick wall with a bat and it couldnt traveling that fast? where were all the seats and the wings/tail? where was the black box??which was never found or submitted. where are the burn marks on the grass due to exterior impact on the outer walls of the pentagon, where were all the dead bodies supposedly on board, why was it that, that part of the building just happened to be under constructions and having minimal amount of casualities, how could the plane of flown so low to hit that low and not hit cars or light poles etc.......

That is one of my MANY questions, that and why a line 2 days earlier like I said was painted on the grass that was the exact path the plane or whatever it was took. I hear interviews from people who made the parts of the plane and they say what was shown is not from that airliner. The FAA still shows the plane that crashed in the field still has a active FAA number, so we have 2 planes that crashed, yet no one saw the 2 actually hit, and the debree left from both are so minimal its like they just didnt exsist at all? To much doesnt add up, Im tellin ya.

[Chris Mazda]

well there really is no proof either way...the previous tapes showing impact definitly showed an object SMALLER than a plane hit the wall, but it was too fast to really tell. also the hole in the pentagon wall was way too small to be a 747.



shit links dont work.^^

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/..._evidence.html

it was a boeing 757 bit of a size difference there ace

[Brett]

I still believe the pentagon was hit by a plane. i have seen no evidence , regardless , that we hit it with a missle.

The engine parts recovered are not that of the size plane they claim hit it, meaning wasnt the airliner and still I cant see how anyone believes this airliner hit and there was no peices of a plane to recover, a plane that size would have peices left, The heat was not at a melting point to melt everything.

Explain the line that was painted on the ground 2 days before the crash that was an exact line the plane took ( yes there are pictures that show this line 2 days before )

Explain how no lightpole on the highway was hit by the plane when it went right over the highyway, etc... TO MANY THINGS DONT ADD UP, and the fact they held this video for 4 years proves it.

[Ruiner]

The engine parts recovered are not that of the size plane they claim hit it, meaning wasnt the airliner and still I cant see how anyone believes this airliner hit and there was no peices of a plane to recover, a plane that size would have peices left, The heat was not at a melting point to melt everything.

Explain the line that was painted on the ground 2 days before the crash that was an exact line the plane took ( yes there are pictures that show this line 2 days before )

Explain how no lightpole on the highway was hit by the plane when it went right over the highyway, etc... TO MANY THINGS DONT ADD UP, and the fact they held this video for 4 years proves it.

WRONG! Read this and you will see that it IS the same type of plane...

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/..._evidence.html

[Brett]

WRONG! Read this and you will see that it IS the same type of plane...

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/..._evidence.html

I will read that on my break for sure

[Ruiner]

I will read that on my break for sure

Please do. Read this as well:

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ppfinal.html

[Brett]

I will for sure, I always want to read the facts on this issue, Because to much just doesnt make sense about the Pentagon attack, so I like to read things that show otherwise.

[YokotaS13]

I still believe the pentagon was hit by a plane. i have seen no evidence , regardless , that we hit it with a missle.

ditto