You don't think Barry Bonds was Hall of Fame worthy prior to 2001??? He was the best Left fielder of the 90's.Originally Posted by Hulud
no he didnt gold gloves dont mean shit when it comes to hall of fame
everyone and their mothers put theirin on how a certain player is hall of fame bound i mean if every player that the analysts say should be in the hall of fame half of the players playing right now would be getting in
bonds was a good player before roids
now hes just another meathead
best left fielder of that 90s shouldnt get you in the hall
there were no good left fielders then
this is what is dumb about analysts that they think that because someone was the best at their position during a time span where everyone else was mediocre that they should be in the hall
Val for President
Just answer the question and stop trying to make a political point lmao. Bonds is hall of fame worthy, it doesn't matter if all the other left fielders of the time weren't worth a shit, that doesn't take away at him being excellent. I mean, if Bonds isn't Hall of Fame worthy, I can't think of a single player from the 90's/00's (thus far) that should go in ahead of him, not a single one.
i have answered the question in both my previous posts
maybe you should get off his unusually small nuts and realize HE WAS ONLY GOOD, and now isnt any good of a PLAYER
no other players should go into the hall before him? WTF?
Nolan Ryan?
Roger Clemens?
Cal Ripken?
just to name a few, your going to be that ignorant and say bonds is a better PLAYER than them?
Val for President
Yes, he is, and believe it or not, he is still a great player. For being his age and having 2 bad knee's, he is still a damn good player. Just cause the man may have done steroids or some form of muscle enhancers, I dont believe that should take away from his talent or legend. Sure you can put a * next to his name if he's ever found guilty, but he is still the best player of the 90's. And I'm not hanging on his nuts, I've been a Bonds fan since back in 92 when the Braves played the pirates in the playoffs.i have answered the question in both my previous posts
maybe you should get off his unusually small nuts and realize HE WAS ONLY GOOD, and now isnt any good of a PLAYER
no other players should go into the hall before him? WTF?
Nolan Ryan?
Roger Clemens?
Cal Ripken?
just to name a few, your going to be that ignorant and say bonds is a better PLAYER than them?
how? he cant run anymore, he doesnt play everyday, the only thing hes good for is hitting
what do you mean? did you miss the memo? he admitted to useing steroidsFor being his age and having 2 bad knee's, he is still a damn good player. Just cause the man may have done steroids or some form of muscle enhancers, I dont believe that should take away from his talent or legend. Sure you can put a * next to his name if he's ever found guilty,
actually you are hanging on his nuts, it doesnt matter how long you been a fan your still hanging on his nuts like hes the best, hes notbut he is still the best player of the 90's. And I'm not hanging on his nuts, I've been a Bonds fan since back in 92 when the Braves played the pirates in the playoffs.
Val for President
How's that make him any different than "Big Papi" David Ortiz, the runner up for MVP last year? He can hit better than Ortiz, and unlike Ortiz, Bonds can still field pretty good. Not to mention he's fuckin' 11 years older than him.
Bonds is almost 42 years old, old enough to be some of the current MLB players dad, and still whoopin' ass. It's just my opinion tho, so you can think I'm a "nut hugger" all you want, he, like Michael Vick, is the most exciting player to watch in his sport. Atleast when it comes to batting.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote