I didn't lose anything. I showed you that we did respond to the attack on the Cole with the military. you claimed that the military had not accomplished anything in the past 10-15 years.

I also showed you that the Soviet Union was around still less than 30 years ago, and was a threat to the US, which you asked for, implying that we had not threats against us in the last 30 years.

I do not read InfoWars. I study history and facts.

The nukes in Russia are still aimed at the US, that is fact, and our nukes are still aimed at them. These facts are undeniable, and nuclear war is still a threat. While tensions are not at all time highs, the threat remains, and our military is our first line of defense. ICBMs can easily hit anywhere in the US, not just Alaska. You don't seem to understand the distance that rockets can travel, and if you think that we can just pop them out of the air, you do not understand the difficulty of hitting a target like that.
Now, personaly, I do not think that we will have a nuclear war in the near future, but the threat remains regardless of what you wish to believe.

Improvised devices are not what were being referred to. The Russians had him investigate how to smuggle in military grade tactical nuclear warheads into the Shenendoah Valley area. Now, with our current capability of detection, I would suspect it is harder for them to do that now, but it shows that they did do research into it already - and that is a first strike tactic, which is a threat. You wanted to imply that we had not military threats against us.

You lose again. You are making a bad habit of it.