so I had chick-fil-a this morning

[bu villain]

Currently, it is legally defined in each state. Just get enough people to tell their state congressman to change the law. It's that simple, but the gay community doesn't seem to be interested in doing it the proper legal way.

What exactly are they doing that is illegal? Much of our country's application of law is not based on popular vote. Shit, I wish I got to vote on the Citizens United decision.

[David88vert]

What exactly are they doing that is illegal? Much of our country's application of law is not based on popular vote. Shit, I wish I got to vote on the Citizens United decision.

As I stated, the marriage license laws are defined at a state level. Georgia has overwhelmingly voted to clarify the definition of marriage as man-woman in 2004. There are no resolutions being promoted in the state legislature to change that. Instead, the gay community wishes to have DC override the states area of management of marriage laws and redefine it from a federal level. This is not how the structure of government was setup, nor has ever been managed like this. it is against everything the founding fathers setup.

[ItODDospeed]

As I stated, the marriage license laws are defined at a state level. Georgia has overwhelmingly voted to clarify the definition of marriage as man-woman in 2004. There are no resolutions being promoted in the state legislature to change that. Instead, the gay community wishes to have DC override the states area of management of marriage laws and redefine it from a federal level. This is not how the structure of government was setup, nor has ever been managed like this. it is against everything the founding fathers setup.

Yeah, some of the founding father's owned slaves. How did that work out for us as a country? It's a federal matter, not a state matter, or we'd still have slavery. You really don't understand history that well.