Just change the definition? That simple? Might as well change the constitution and the bill of rights to include the privilege of marriage a right for everyone. Stop trying to make yourself out to be some kind of superior wise intellect because you put your foot in your mouth every time you post. What qualifies you as "smarter" than me or anyone here? What credentials do you posses that makes you an expert in theology, genetics, history, sociology, or psychology? Taking a semester of a class makes you no expert sir. The fact is that you use google, read articles, and then relay that information here. No different than anyone else here posting in this thread. So get off that pedestool like your some kind of professor talking down to ignorant college students. You have nothing to teach me sir. It is fact that there is not conclusive evidence to support sexual orientation is genetic. There are theories and speculations...nothing more. Otherwise this topic would not be debatable and the scientific community would be in agreement. Personally I think you are just itching to jump out the closet and announce your homosexuality on IA, but that is neither here nor there. In reality, this is not a debate, as neither of us is willing to accept the others position. Rather, this is an argument between two guys that know no more about genetics than what we have read online. So, back to the topic. This is a simple fact, marriage is not a civil right under the constitution, therefore there is no discrimination nor injustice being done to the gay community.
QD: it does indeed effect me when a Christian is told to keep their beliefs and practices out of government while gays are able to force their agenda on the American people. They cry bigotry and injustice when none of the sort is taking place.





Reply With Quote