Mustang: There were a LOT of other talking points in that thread which I am generalizing to prevent the post from being 9 pages long in it's own right. Again I am going to GENERALIZE. The article I wrote said, "why build a car when you could buy one that puts out 400hp with a factory warranty... Why have 2 separate cars (daily and project) when you can have 2 in 1?". You said "I could out-run a mustang for the money"... True, but sacrificing reliability and warranty... You then said "Said built 240/Rx7/whatever would be just as reliable"... Bullshit, and it still won't have a 40k mile warranty. You then proceed to post 999999 pictures of nice looking tuner cars which somehow proves me wrong? Never did YOU support that god damn argument with fact (because you can't... project cars by nature are not reliable), just as you never really addressed the main point of what I was trying to say. Anyone who tries to disprove you regarding reliability (I gave up because I thought I was talking to someone with downs syndrome), you tell them they don't know what they're talking about and call their mechanical skills into question. You know how many positive reps I got for calling you out on that "mustangs are hard to beat" thread? That should tell you something, which certainly isn't that I'm grasping for straws.
I could truly give a fuck about Tebow, but adding together his stats (which you did get called out for by someone else in that thread), again is just an example of you twisting facts.
Truth be told the only reason I said "Hell, you might be a cool guy in person, but I HATE having debates with your ass." is because I am trying to keep it friendly in case we ever meet face to face, but my perception is that you are an ignorant loudmouth who doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about. One of those dudes who will yell over you in an argument because they feel like they're winning if they're talking louder or more often. The type that NEEDS the last word because even if said last work is completely irrelevant, they still won the argument.
They say ignorance is bliss... You must be the most happy motherfucker on the face of this planet.
Originally Posted by CRAMERIZKING
Mustang: There were a LOT of other talking points in that thread which I am generalizing to prevent the post from being 9 pages long in it's own right. Again I am going to GENERALIZE. The article I wrote said, "why build a car when you could buy one that puts out 400hp with a factory warranty... Why have 2 separate cars (daily and project) when you can have 2 in 1?". You said "I could out-run a mustang for the money"... True, but sacrificing reliability and warranty... You then said "Said built 240/Rx7/whatever would be just as reliable"... Bullshit, and it still won't have a 40k mile warranty. You then proceed to post 999999 pictures of nice looking tuner cars which somehow proves me wrong? Never did YOU support that god damn argument with fact (because you can't... project cars by nature are not reliable), just as you never really addressed the main point of what I was trying to say. Anyone who tries to disprove you regarding reliability (I gave up because I thought I was talking to someone with downs syndrome), you tell them they don't know what they're talking about and call their mechanical skills into question. You know how many positive reps I got for calling you out on that "mustangs are hard to beat" thread? That should tell you something, which certainly isn't that I'm grasping for straws.
Reply With Quote