You initially said, "and i pulled in front of this car, not really cutting him off, but im sure it prob suprised him." So you admitted to possibly pulling out in front of him. Now your story changes?
That is still defined as road rage. You do not have to be in your vehicle to commit road rage.
Again this is road rage on your part. Anything you do to continue an antagonistic situation will be seen as road rage on your part.
Your reasoning for being in a hurry was understandable. Was what you did road rage? Most certainly. Again, your actions fall 100% in the line of a road rage incident.
I promise you that I'm right. You weren't the only one at fault. It was on him as well. But as long as you participated, you'd both be fined or arrested or however it was handled by LEO. Later, QD.






Reply With Quote