Utah isn't half as good as you think they are. God I wish Florida could play Utah..........Originally Posted by B
Utah isn't half as good as you think they are. God I wish Florida could play Utah..........Originally Posted by B
You fail at College Football.Originally Posted by B
I'm not trying to discredit Utah, they came out and kicked ass tonight. But to say Utah would beat Florida just because they put up three more points against Alabama is terrible logic.
agreedOriginally Posted by alpine_aw11
If it makes you feel any better the reason why i wasn't watching YOUR game was because i was in the hot tub with 4 girls...and myself of course....But the bitches started fighting and i had to break it up.....
But i still got some ass and bama lost....GO UTAH
fuck bama you forgot i'm a DAWG FAN
we beat msu so thats all i care about. good way to end the season. go dawgs
Wrong...Originally Posted by XLR8NMR2
I hope
Originally Posted by sögoodM3
Please quote where I said that Utah would beat Florida!
I said no one can say for sure that they couldn't and THAT is what is so good about college football.
That is like that jackass saying FOR CERTAIN that Florida would stomp USC. Florida needs to worry about Oklamhoma before their fans go running their mouths.
Not to mention, no one gave Utah a chance in hell to beat Alabama. Alabama was too big, too strong, too good. Well they did, convincingly. They didn't win on one last minute trick play, they won in convincing fashion.
This is what you scrubs are doing:![]()
This is what you should be doing:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Game. Set. Match.
Utah should be mentioned in the AP national title. SHould they split with the winner of the NC game? Probably not (unless Florida ends up winning on a last second field goal), but they should be mentioned. More so than USC or Texas (if they beat Ohio State).
Originally Posted by redGT
Also, for the record:
Utah is the ONLY team in the BCS era to go undefeated TWICE.
Originally Posted by redGT
Alabama's strength of schedule = 79th
Utah's strength of schedule = 56th
Alabama had nearly an identical SOC as Boise State, maybe that would be a better game.
This proves a bias toward the SEC. Voters don't look at what a team is doing NOW, they factor in history of a program and even future potential. An imperfect, unfair system.
How sad is it that a team with the NCAA 79th SOS can be ranked #1 for 5 weeks and a team that went undefeated with a harder SOS isn't?
Originally Posted by redGT
lol yeah for realOriginally Posted by Ed
STFU- I do.
Originally Posted by redGT
YEAH ME TOO
-----------------------> This ones for you ED
It was an obvious implication and you know it. Just because Utah beat Bama by 3 more points means nothing, Florida is a better team and I don't think you can seriously dispute that. Yes, Utah won in convincing fashion, I don't think anyone's arguing that with you.Originally Posted by B
As for your SOC rankings, not sure where you got them from. The rankings I'm seeing put Utah and Bama right on par with each other.
Originally Posted by sögoodM3
And yet one was ranked #1 and the other was ranked as high as #6?![]()
Something doesn't add up, does it?
Originally Posted by redGT
This.
Thread.
Won't.
Die.
Fck the SEC
Originally Posted by redGT
All that shows me is how inaccurate the rankings you're pulling are, neither Utah nor Alabama are even close to having the toughest schedules.Originally Posted by B
Talk all the trash you want about the SEC, I personally don't really care. I'm not an SEC fan, just a Gators fan.
How are my rankings inaccurate? It isn't my fault Alabama was ranked #1. I don't have a vote.
Originally Posted by redGT
"Was" being the key word there. I don't give a damn what Alabama's SOC ranking was earlier in the season, I'm talking current rankings, to which 'Bama is nowhere near the top at this point.Originally Posted by B