Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
You're lost.
Ran called EVERYBODY with tats "trashy". So therefore he did glob everybody into a category, which by definition is stereotyping.
You and him both go look the definition of "trashy" in any dictionary. I'm willing to bet that nowhere in any definition does it use the words "tattoo". Wanna bet?
That's an ASSumption based solely on a split second's visual perception of someone. "Trashy" is usually reserved for people who ACT "trashy". Therefore, how is it humanly possible to say someone is "trashy" when you've not even met them, heard them speak, saw them act, know where they live....etc. It would be perfectly fine to say that you think someone looks or acts "trashy" and they happen to have tats. One doesn't have to automatically affect the other. But much like calling EVERY black person the N word just because ONE or TWO or TWENTY act like they have no class, it shows that you are narrow minded by forgetting the other 20 Billion that aren't.
You'd be wrong then. I've never looked at a woman and sized up what I thought she'd be like in bed. Sure, I've admired and fantasized about what they'd be like in bed, but never......and I mean never.....assumed she would or wouldn't be.