Quote Originally Posted by xlivingfor1x
i agree that the strong will lead the weak. and i do believe that it is human nature to look for answers, and if you dont find them within, then you look to the person that you feel has them.

i think that if establishment waa destroyed and we were set back hundreds of years. and we were all a bunch of naked native amaericans running around, we would still use our human instinct, vote on a leader, follow this leader, create some kind of board of officials and continue to evolve from there.

not because the strong lead the weak, this can go one of two ways. the strongest controls the weak and he can create rules and regulations that benefit the common good of everyone, or they can create rules and regulations that benefit them and them alone.
Human faults at their finest hmm?

Quote Originally Posted by xlivingfor1x
example of strong leading the weak for good: US gov is in theory, for the people. (noted that everyone makes mistakes.)
example of strong leading the weak gone wrong: monarchies or governments that set forth laws that people are required to provide leaders with possesions and position.
If you think the US Government acts on behalf of the people then you're out of your mind.

Quote Originally Posted by xlivingfor1x
by choosing to disband the goverment, you are setting us back thousands of years and attempting to stray away from human nature. you take the risk of allowing the evil take over and create something much much worse.
It's a risk worth taking in my opinion. Also, how would giving humanity a clean slate be setting anything back? Setting what back? These materialistic and superficial distractions? No loss there.

Quote Originally Posted by admin
see this brings up another point - enslavement creates direction/focus and creates needs/wants.
I disagree. Basic nature creates focus and needs/wants. I'd rather be enslaved to my own basic drives then to the authority of others.