BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD!!!

[blacknightteg]

Lolol @ Real Monsters and "a long time ago" in the same conversation. Later, QD.

lol go easy mike, it was a good long time ago. lol.

[quickdodge®]

lol go easy mike, it was a good long time ago. lol.

I guess to younger people it would be. Lolol. You know that came out a year after B&B and Ren & Stimpy. 1994. These aren't classics by any means but were the last of good cartoons. All the Marvel Comics superhero cartoons (Spiderman, Superman and others) were completely fucked up when the artists started drawing them and what they would look like on steroids. Later, QD.

[blacknightteg]

I guess to younger people it would be. Lolol. You know that came out a year after B&B and Ren & Stimpy. 1994. These aren't classics by any means but were the last of good cartoons. All the Marvel Comics superhero cartoons (Spiderman, Superman and others) were completely fucked up when the artists started drawing them and what they would look like on steroids. Later, QD.

lol true. its been forever since there were good cartoons. i still like to watch cartoons too and there really aint shit anymore. those were some of best to watch in my younger years. now all the cartoons are ridiculously stupid.

[SOHC MONSTER]

lol true. its been forever since there were good cartoons. i still like to watch cartoons too and there really aint shit anymore. those were some of best to watch in my younger years. now all the cartoons are ridiculously stupid.

Especially now that they are computer animated. I guess the computer is cheaper than a cartoonist.

[quickdodge®]

Especially now that they are computer animated. I guess the computer is cheaper than a cartoonist.

They are. Which is weird because it's just about opposite with a CGI movie with voice overs. A lot of times, if you get a famous actor (Whoopi Goldberg, Eddie Murphy, etc.) to voice over a CGI film, it costs just as much if not more than if the actor actually appeared in a live taping. Later, QD.

[SOHC MONSTER]

They are. Which is weird because it's just about opposite with a CGI movie with voice overs. A lot of times, if you get a famous actor (Whoopi Goldberg, Eddie Murphy, etc.) to voice over a CGI film, it costs just as much if not more than if the actor actually appeared in a live taping. Later, QD.

Thats weird. Thats Hollywood for ya. Someone is always making money.

[BKgen®]

Especially now that they are computer animated. I guess the computer is cheaper than a cartoonist.

The computer doesn't do the animation itself.

Most are done in flash, or a similar 2d animation program -- but there are a select few that are still shot on traditional Cels.

Also, don't get it twisted -- Most of the digitally made cartoons these days are crap as far as traditional animation techniques go (the 12 principles of animation), but that doesn't mean all digitally animated work is crap.

[quickdodge®]

but that doesn't mean all digitally animated work is crap.

Cartoons just aren't as good (looking) or funny as they used to be. Later, QD.