Poll will be up shortly.
Thoughts on this?
Poll will be up shortly.
Thoughts on this?
According to Obama, it's just a tiny country, they're nothing.
Why not.
If they present a credible threat to our safety, then yes. Seeing as I don't think they do I'm gonna go with no for now.
Israel will get them first.
Yeah, we should only be there for 6 months..
YAY!!!!
no because my boss is iranian... lol
̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(•̪●)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
Originally Posted by Stormhammer
7-11 or BP?
jk, anyways... I don't think we should invade just to invade... BUT if there is reason too, then yes. But ATM, I don't think there is...
Back to being stock and slow
f*ck that. if you honestly think we should invade you should get your head checked.
we are spread too thin as it is, we need to find osama first. we need to get out of iraq first. we need to redeploy our troops across the globe more efficiently first, and most of all we need to fix our country FIRST.
Val for President
most people dont reall think anything of Israel but for a small ass countryi think they would hold thier own if they went to war with us.Originally Posted by Echonova
lol it would be afganistan all over again. kill us with our own weaponsOriginally Posted by dohc4.6sc
![]()
Val for President
blinds actually. the ones in your window? workers 99% had an iranian bossOriginally Posted by Motivation
̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(•̪●)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
Originally Posted by Evil Goat
Actually it does, many Economists have proven this.
And no, it'd be absolutely stupid to attack Iran. Far far cry from the terrain of Iraq.
there would be no reason to attack them. the american people wont be dupped again.
go ahead and let him build nuclear reactors to fuel their country. they even built their own rocket to send tv satelites into space, how many countries do that without the West holding their hand?
anyway there is so many iranians in america and people against attacking them its not even funny. i guarantee you that if america attacks, there will be at least 1 million people holding protest signs right on the steps of the whitehouse.
Would you like proof from the Department of Energy?Originally Posted by Evil Goat
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/consumer...rgy_savers.pdf
(pg 33)
Maybe Nascar appeals to you?
http://www.nascar.com/2006/auto/07/25/tires/
Uniroyal and the Rubber Manufacturers Associan
http://www.uniroyal.com/about/articles/09152005A.html
Michelin, ever heard of them?
http://www.swampfox.ws/node/26318
Plenty has been said by the government as well, under the Bush administration
http://www.gao.gov/htext/d07246r.html
And on a personal note, I recently got my tires changed and inflated.. seeing about a 4mpg increase. I'm sure when you're driving vehicles that struggle to get 20mpg its hard to comprehend efficiency but yes keeping tires inflated in the grand scheme of things makes a huge difference in our dependency on oil.
like the other guy said, no unless there is a reason to go.
obama h. christ....i know by inflating your tires and having a proper tune up you can increase your gas mileage, what i want to know is how it would affect the oil markets....im not going to research it as, like i said, i know itll be a cold day in hell when people come together in unison to do something, so it will never happenOriginally Posted by tony
its like saying if frogs had wings they wouldnt bump their ass when they hopped....we all know that, but it will never happen, unless obama says it right?
umm in the overall picture it makes cars more fuel efficient therefore to some extent cutting back on gas useage which is directly related to oil....Originally Posted by Evil Goat
̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(•̪●)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
holy not staying on topic batman
Agreed. I think if we end up going into Iran, it will be because of something they did to Israel or vice versa.Originally Posted by Echonova
Communism works in theory also...Originally Posted by tony
Once you bring the human element in, it all goes to ****
IA Rules doesn't allow these images in sigs
- IA Mgmt
Originally Posted by fcman
![]()
To take a survey and found out who on IA would be in support of or against invading Iran in our current situation.Originally Posted by quickdodge®
What would invading iran solve? We surely don't need any more enemies or wars out in the middle east.
10$ these guys voted bush and will vote mccainapex2305, BanginJimmy, DJ Maestro, PURE jdm![]()
I do not support any attack on IRAN, I think we would get in much deeper than we ever did with IRAQ, and IRAN would put up much more of a fight, and not to mention what that would do to global oil prices, etc.
Brett (One of the true OG's, No really... ask anyone)
'15 Chevy SS
'16 K7 SXL SWP
www.facebook.com/brett.lowenthal1
R.I.P Leisa, You are never forgotten - 10/7/08
Actually I voted yes to be an ass, I didnt even read the thread first thinking it had to do with that lame ass article posted earlier.Originally Posted by admin
Either way, if they present a threat, and they do, but not one that needs to be directly addressed by us right now, then I would vote yes. Until then, they dont present a threat to the American public. They do present a threat to our troops, but as of everything I have seen, they are not crossing the border with their own troops, only sending suppies.
Israel does have a valid reason to make in rain steel in Iran, and I think that if we do get involved there it will be because Israel acted first. Iran is not dumb enough to throw the first blow.
Originally Posted by admin
I did vote for Bush, but only because he was the lesser of the evils. Both Kerry and Gore would have torn the country apart. The sad fact is that Obama plans to tear it apart also.
Originally Posted by fcman
All while modern societies that were once Communist now laugh at capitalism as we borrow money from them.
Originally Posted by BanginJimmy
um and we are in a good state now w/ bush in charge
![]()
When Obama gets elected (not that I support him or his opposition) we'll find out if he tears the country apart.
:wgaf: not like it'll be up to us if/when it happens
Azz to mouth?Originally Posted by Motivation
I didnt say that, I said they would tear the country apart, not stumble around in an occupation that could have been over 2 years ago.Originally Posted by admin
ATM = Annual Terrestrial Manicure
Yeah, except the fact that the U.S. funds their military and provides them weapons..Originally Posted by dohc4.6sc
I don't even know what to say..
(-rep'ed just to get your attention so that you will come back in this thread)