Who caused the Wreck on 85-N?

[quickdodge®]

The implication is clearly there. You said, "And not involuntary [manslaughter] because he was intending on driving recklessly." You're applying his intent to drive recklessly to his intent to kill.

Actually, you are implying that that's what I said. You're reading more into this than I am. I guess to make you not look wrong? I don't think you're wrong in this. Just wrong about you THINK that I actually am saying.

But anyway.....

I'd have a lot more faith in the human spirit if this kid would just man up instead of trying to dodge the consequences.

You and me both, homey. Later, QD.

[chunky]

Actually, you are implying that that's what I said. You're reading more into this than I am. I guess to make you not look wrong? I don't think you're wrong in this. Just wrong about you THINK that I actually am saying.

But anyway.....



You and me both, homey. Later, QD.

I said:

"You are trying to implicate that he intentionally killed these people. "

You said:

"In a sense he did. He drove like this knowingly and willingly. He knew the dangers of his driving habit."

http://www.importatlanta.com/forums/...&postcount=105

Just thought I'd throw that out there. Anyhow, that point of contention is of no real consequnce anymore. :p

[quickdodge®]

I said:

"You are trying to implicate that he intentionally killed these people. "

You said:

"In a sense he did. He drove like this knowingly and willingly. He knew the dangers of his driving habit."

And it's true. In a sense he did. In a sense are the key words. We both know that that wasn't his intent.

Anyhow, that point of contention is of no real consequnce anymore.

Yessir. Later, QD.