Quote Originally Posted by redGT


How about we just let the chargers show how good the Pats and tom brady are. Yea Manning might have better stats but lets not forget Manning has 2 more yaers under his belt. than brady and really when you think about its really 3 more years. I'm not a nutrider I'm a fan I'm sorry that manning didn't take the colts to the super bowl again this year. But basically when you can't make an argument without calling someone a nutrider you really show that you have run out of things to argue. To actually address what you said. The reason the whole "Who's got more super bowls" arguement comes up is because THAT'S WHAT QB'S GET PAID TO DO TO GET TO AND WIN SUPERBOWL'S!!!
I didn't run out of things to argue, I called you a nutrider for throwing out that lame ass smiley when I put up solid proof that Manning is a better QB than Brady, and the fact that you used every bit of QB history possible to argue Brady's case while all you said for Manning was:
Quote Originally Posted by redGT
1st overall pick in the draft in 98 See where i'm going witrh this. It doesn't exactly hurt either when your old man played in the NFL either does it?
The 2 more years under his belt would be a valid argument, but even then, look at their past 5-6 consecutive seasons AFTER Brady was already an established starter in the Pats superbowl seasons.
Quote Originally Posted by redGT
To actually address what you said. The reason the whole "Who's got more super bowls" arguement comes up is because THAT'S WHAT QB'S GET PAID TO DO TO GET TO AND WIN SUPERBOWL'S!!!
Aw damn, and all this time I thought the rest of the team had something to do with that, lol. Like what was said earlier, do you believe Brady could've gotten those rings with the Raiders, 49ers, Cardinals, etc?