I didn't run out of things to argue, I called you a nutrider for throwing out that lame ass

smiley when I put up solid proof that Manning is a better QB than Brady, and the fact that you used every bit of QB history possible to argue Brady's case while all you said for Manning was: The 2 more years under his belt would be a valid argument, but even then, look at their past 5-6 consecutive seasons AFTER Brady was already an established starter in the Pats superbowl seasons.
Aw damn, and all this time I thought the rest of the team had something to do with that, lol. Like what was said earlier, do you believe Brady could've gotten those rings with the Raiders, 49ers, Cardinals, etc?