Quote Originally Posted by redGT
Ok this is the most ridiculous post in this thread so far. I'm packing for a flight that I have to catch so I will make it quick.

SO ****ING WHAT THAT HE WAS A STAR!!!!!!!!! That doesn't mean that he should get longer because he "dissappointed his fans". What you are suggesting is a double standard. Star's shouldn't recieve less than the average person for a committed crime but they should recieve more? The law was not designed to play favorites all though some judges have done so when it has come time for sentencing. So your saying that we have to hold people in a better standing than ourselves to more extreme standards. 25 years is excessive no matter which way you look at it. yes he had fans manny of which were young but do you know what the parents if they are good parents will say to said children. they will sit them down and say what he did was wrong and it was a crime under the law and he will have to go away for a while to pay for his mistakes and with this standing sentence make an example out of him to your children. to give him 25 years would be ridiculous, overkill, and down right stupid.
X2 completely true. What gets me so mad is that people make some of the dumbest comments, when it comes to this issue. Whoever said he deserves more than what he got is a idiot. What he recieved is okay in my eyes. Vick probably should have gotten probation, and paid a hefty fine. The man had no criminal record, which in most cases would give you probation.