Quote Originally Posted by EvasiveEF9
In number 3, misinterpretation, you forgot to add that the civil rights movement and stuff is going to COMPLETELY forget that a boy was injured in this "tragedy" and the court case all together...and the main topic will be "unfair treatment of black people" rather than "this kid threatened police with a "gun", so they took him out"
Exactly. This will turn into the same muddled down fiasco that the Atlanta one did when they shot that lady in her house. Everyone conveniently skipped over the fact that her son (or grandson) was dealing drugs out of there, that she had a gun and fired on police when they busted in (in police uniforms yelling police things like "freeze Police"). They only saw that a black woman was shot.

The excuses were great. "Well, she didn't know they were police" HELLOOOO, a bunch of WHITE dudes come busting in your house in the GHETTO, i'm sure thats a rare occurance round them there parts. Something must be amiss. "Robbers have used police uniforms before" True...black on black crime sucks, but see above.

Was it a tradgedy? Sure as hell was. Nobody likes to see someone get full of bullets in their own home. But was it the cops fault? Nope, the blame lies squarely on the head of the son or grandson that was dealing drugs out of his grandmothers house. He will rot in hell for that. Not the media, not the cops, not mine or yours or the Sultan of Brunais, but that stupid kid who put his grandmother in harms way.