Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
Anyway, the article echoes exactly what all of us have been saying here with the exception of religious opposition which noone has brought up in our discussion yet.
Well, its hard to say anything religion wise... I mean what would be worse, having a child under age ( and an abortion even ) and out of wedlock, or taking preventative means to not have such a child and out of wedlock, even though both options still violate having sex without being married ( which is of no surprise in today's society ) - so religion kinda has to sit this one out... I don't really see how it would be against religion like how abortion would