Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900

Personally, I agree with those of that feel that sex education and morals should be the responsability of the parents. Which opens up yet another pandorah's box.....what if the parents are irresponsible and the children are in the custody of the court? Should the courts take over where the parents didn't? Should the courts be allowed to give children in their custody birth control like they do any other medicine or inoculation? Should tax payers, who ultimately pay for all of these unwanted children and their unwanted pregnancies, have to keep bank rolling the never ending cycle?

Discuss some more.

Well, I'm just saying birth control would be a disturbing, and yet sadly for the age a responsible decision if the parents failed at their responsibility of being open, instilling morals, and what not. As sad as it is, in today's world, some parent's just don't give a damn ( think of how many middle school girls you see at the mall friday night with a credit card, miniskirt, and chit chatting on cell phones... yeah... )

If the child is in the possession of the court... ack, well I don't necessarily think the court could rule if the girl is going to be sexually active or not, so again I think that it should be a viable option. I mean as bad as this sounds, but as a tax payer, birth control would be both a cheaper as well as a safer and more viable alternative than having to pay for the welfare of an unplanned child