Bush sucks just my 2 cent

[GIXXERDK]

Thought this was funny

[Brett]

LMAO!!! Thats ****in funny as hell no matter if you like him or not!!

[man]

well kerrys not president now is he?

It's called opportunity cost. We made the best decision with both elections and this is where we stand now. Making fun of Bush or saying how much you hate him doesn't help anything. Sorry but approval ratings don't show how good/bad of a job he's doing, just how many more broke bitches hate him and the rich boys are still at the top.

[BB6dohcvtec]

It's called opportunity cost. We made the best decision with both elections and this is where we stand now. Making fun of Bush or saying how much you hate him doesn't help anything. Sorry but approval ratings don't show how good/bad of a job he's doing, just how many more broke bitches hate him and the rich boys are still at the top.

approval ratings actually show how bad he is doing when his own party thinks he's a jackass. hmm are you one of those rich boys?

[Deke]

Because giving speeches is what being president is all about.

You're right, it isn't, but it is definitely a sizeable part of it. One of a presidents main jobs is pretty much public relations. He represents the US everytime he gives a speach. And him having the public speaking skills of a 9th grader certianly doesn't reflect well on our nation.


I personally can't stand the guy. I don't agree with the majority of his policy in regards to the war. I just think he's afraid that everyone will think he's weak if he changes his mind about anything. Which brings me to the next point, the man is a dumbass. Now obviously you can argue that just because he isn't a public speaker doesn't mean he's an idiot. Alright, sure I'll give you that. But just look at any of the numerous episodes of retardedness when he's in a Q&A environment. Not only are his responses often incoherent, but on more than one occasion they've displayed that he was in fact oblivious to what the subject matter even was.

Now would I like Kerry better? Well, I'm not positive, but I'm going say probably not. I liked how South Park portrayed the last election, between a turd sandwich and a giant douche.

PS This is all coming from someone who is generally moderate with a republican lean.

[tippatone]

IMO, i like him... my personal prefrance, i have my reasons..

BUT....

remember, would you rather have him, or.. um.. kerry?

ARE YOU CRAZY? His whole presidency is based on lies, deception and utter stupidtity. Did you forget about the whole domestic spying thing? If bush dies before he leaves office i will be happy, oh he did a great job after hurricane katrina.

[man]

hmm are you one of those rich boys?

Would a rich boy drive a $2k RX-7?

[yudalicious]

idc about him too much... the war kept us from another attack on my openion...

IMO we are generating future terrorists against the US with the messy situation we got ourselves in.

[AnthonyF]

hey brian...i voted for him.


the main reason was b/c i hated Kerry. he is a "war veteran"? not a chance. My father and grand father were. this cocksucker was a lyin piece of **** about that. it was disrespectful to my family and to other REAL war veterans

[1000cckiller]

hey brian...i voted for him.

Ant because you are gay, and you relate to his ninth grade speaking skills WTFHYB?

[1000cckiller]

hey brian...i voted for him.


the main reason was b/c i hated Kerry. he is a "war veteran"? not a chance. My father and grand father were. this cocksucker was a lyin piece of **** about that. it was disrespectful to my family and to other REAL war veterans

Bush went awol so what about him? Also hes a drunk and a pot smoker.

[AnthonyF]

Bush went awol so what about him? Also hes a drunk and a pot smoker.

who is? which one? dude...they are both dip****s ok. You had 2 dip****s to pick from. I picked one based on personal reasons.

[1000cckiller]

who is? which one? dude...they are both dip****s ok. You had 2 dip****s to pick from. I picked one based on personal reasons.

personal reasons, dont make a good choice. Besides no one knows what Kerry would have done, because he was never in office. Both are pieces of S*** though.

[AnthonyF]

Both are pieces of S*** though.

agreed. i just dont argue over it cuz its stupid and almost over

[Jecht]

IMO we are generating future terrorists against the US with the messy situation we got ourselves in.

I think that we are just angering other countries, which is part of the reason we have people flying planes into buildings and threatening to kill large numbers of U.S. citizens. I don't think it is necessarily Bush's fault, but he obviously had a large role to play in the matter.

[1000cckiller]

I think that we are just angering other countries, which is part of the reason we have people flying planes into buildings and threatening to kill large numbers of U.S. citizens. I don't think it is necessarily Bush's fault, but he obviously had a large role to play in the matter.

I can agree with you, but you know republicans go to war a lot right. Thinks about a lot of the wars, and who was president during them.

[Jecht]

I can agree with you, but you know republicans go to war a lot right. Thinks about a lot of the wars, and who was president during them.

Well, war is good for our economy. I believe that may be why we start wars over small things. Sadam claimed he had "weapons of mass destruction", which is a reason for the U.S. to attack and cause our economy to improve some.

My problem is that I'm not worried about our economy or politics, but that I think it is pointless to go war because someone claimed they had something to kill people with. For example, when someone states that they have a gun and they express dislike for you, does that mean that they are necessarily going to shoot you? It all depends on an evaluation of whether the person would actually use it or if they are merely bragging.

[v-empire]

sorry, didnt read the posts. but all in all,

dont whine and moan after you voted for him.

[1000cckiller]

Well, war is good for our economy. I believe that may be why we start wars over small things. Sadam claimed he had "weapons of mass destruction", which is a reason for the U.S. to attack and cause our economy to improve some.

My problem is that I'm not worried about our economy or politics, but that I think it is pointless to go war because someone claimed they had something to kill people with. For example, when someone states that they have a gun and they express dislike for you, does that mean that they are necessarily going to shoot you? It all depends on an evaluation of whether the person would actually use it or if they are merely bragging.

Troof