Bush sucks just my 2 cent

[fucksohc]

idc about him too much... the war kept us from another attack on my openion...

[yudalicious]

idc about him too much... the war kept us from another attack on my openion...

IMO we are generating future terrorists against the US with the messy situation we got ourselves in.

[Jecht]

IMO we are generating future terrorists against the US with the messy situation we got ourselves in.

I think that we are just angering other countries, which is part of the reason we have people flying planes into buildings and threatening to kill large numbers of U.S. citizens. I don't think it is necessarily Bush's fault, but he obviously had a large role to play in the matter.

[1000cckiller]

I think that we are just angering other countries, which is part of the reason we have people flying planes into buildings and threatening to kill large numbers of U.S. citizens. I don't think it is necessarily Bush's fault, but he obviously had a large role to play in the matter.

I can agree with you, but you know republicans go to war a lot right. Thinks about a lot of the wars, and who was president during them.

[Jecht]

I can agree with you, but you know republicans go to war a lot right. Thinks about a lot of the wars, and who was president during them.

Well, war is good for our economy. I believe that may be why we start wars over small things. Sadam claimed he had "weapons of mass destruction", which is a reason for the U.S. to attack and cause our economy to improve some.

My problem is that I'm not worried about our economy or politics, but that I think it is pointless to go war because someone claimed they had something to kill people with. For example, when someone states that they have a gun and they express dislike for you, does that mean that they are necessarily going to shoot you? It all depends on an evaluation of whether the person would actually use it or if they are merely bragging.

[1000cckiller]

Well, war is good for our economy. I believe that may be why we start wars over small things. Sadam claimed he had "weapons of mass destruction", which is a reason for the U.S. to attack and cause our economy to improve some.

My problem is that I'm not worried about our economy or politics, but that I think it is pointless to go war because someone claimed they had something to kill people with. For example, when someone states that they have a gun and they express dislike for you, does that mean that they are necessarily going to shoot you? It all depends on an evaluation of whether the person would actually use it or if they are merely bragging.

Troof