ThanksOriginally Posted by tracy
he ran an 8.1 in the in the 1/8. hardly his best im sure. just wanted to know what his good times were.YOU said YOU were there when he ran at Dallas. So why do YOU need the timeslip?
oh know that was for you since you talk so much about him having plots and slips i though maybe you could help me out to some links to posted times since they are proven. i know the plots were posted on nasic and deleted. found that out later. but that leaves no proof. as you said he has in the quote belowJust like Doug would say...I'm not in charge of my customers dyno charts or their time slips. I don't post those for them. So maybe you meant to direct that question towards Matt. I'm not sure
I thinks it's funny that you say only one car can talk and all he has is dyno #'s. I mean they are awesome #'s, I haven't disputed that...
I think Matt should "be allowed to talk" in this thread since his car runs, has dyno #'s and track times. He can back up all of what he has claimed.
i apoligized for that to matt. i really wasnt trin to rip his car apart just got carried away cause of you speculations. it is gounded and just looked very close and the rubber cap on the terminal was missing or pushed aside. i understand its a prototype. just not a chance i would have taken.I don't make the turbo kits so I can't comment on how it's supposed to be or what it "would have fried if..." To me that's all specualtion. All I can say is it's not fried and it's running strong...that's 1 of the things I do know.I can also say that we have never fried anyone's car in 4.5 years. That's a fact jack
he already did thanks.I'll try to get dan to answer why the IC piping is the way it is. If not, I'm sure Matt will comment on that.
the end result is im not bashing you or ************ or matt. but i was not drooling over his car like you speculated here.
just my
Reply With Quote