i'm so close to typing it...Quote:
Originally Posted by kayfuNk
but that prolly wouldn't be smart of me...
n..
ni...
***....
nigg.....
nigge......r
Printable View
i'm so close to typing it...Quote:
Originally Posted by kayfuNk
but that prolly wouldn't be smart of me...
n..
ni...
***....
nigg.....
nigge......r
Quote:
Originally Posted by Killer
lol!! it's edits N I G lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i never realized that!!!
Sweet. If, for whatever reason, I come across any other methods of getting around censorship then I'll let you know. :goodjob:Quote:
Originally Posted by Julio
hahaQuote:
Originally Posted by Killer
silly nigger
:lmfao: :ninja: :lmfao:Quote:
Originally Posted by XLR8NMR2
are we also goin to start enforcing then ppl who bypass the censors, as in, typing sh1t instead of shit, and fvck instead of fuck? just wondering how far ur thinking of goin w/this.
replace the words with random symbols .... lol
&#^$* you, you pile of (%^*&.........
See, it looksway cooler thena bunch of *****'s
Didnt we try this an it failed miserably? Just leave the whoreslounge uncensored and censor everything else
Good point and definitely something to consider.Quote:
Originally Posted by shagwAg3n
I say do it everywhere but the WL.
its a business, if XXXXXXX called me tomrrow and said we will pay you $XXXXX.XX but you cant cuss anymore, id say FUCK YEAH
If you could somehow have the forums read aloud and make a beep sound, I will support censoring, especially on speedmonkey and maniacs posts. lol
Just ban them.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH MOTHA TRUCKA
I think it would be hilarious if each cuss word was replaced with "balls" or like the good 'ole SNL skit, "shampoo"
"shampoo me?"
"well shampoo you!"
Who's "we?" :slap:Quote:
Originally Posted by ©hris
---------------------------->
Julio, do what you gotta do, homie.
i still just don't know why i can't say the word ********????
I actually think this is a pretty good idea in moderation. However, censoring every word that could possibly be perceived as a cuss, I think that's a touch excessive. I know that in reality no cuss word is worse than another, but there's a stigma attached to some of the words that makes people seem to think that they're worse than other. I say, if they wouldn't have played it on the radio 5 years ago [sorry, but radio edits these days are ridiculous] then it shouldn't be visible here. Also, in response to shagwagen's post about enacting punishments against 'bypassing' the censor by using fvck instead of fuck, I personally find that a touch excessive. If you want to censor the actual word, then fine, but fvck, no matter what it LOOKS like, is simply not a word.
Cliffs: the 'baddest of the bad', i.e. shit, fuck, cunt, etc. I think it would be a great benefit to the reputation of the forum to block, however, there's an extremely fine line between cleaning up your image and stifling your members.
lol @ where this thread has gone
I say it's a good idea
i say weh have IA REFORM and get rid of alot of teh fag npoobs who want nothing more than drama and wasting time, instead of being a part of the site, and contributing.
How am i supposed to see if someone is a Ebadass if i cant read the cuss words
Fuck yeah Replace that fucking Shit
I really wouldn't care..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halfwit
:goodjob: 1+
It wouldn't bother me...this is one of the few forums that doesn't censor language.
Yea, no big deal.
Go ahead and sensor the site but make some exceptions like the whoreslounge and the killsforum. If you sesored some of the callout and kills between 1civic and slowhawk the world would be a little less funny.:( :no: :cry:
Those two are funny as hell!!!:goodjob:
I remember at one point 1civic's avatar was "slowhawks daddy." :lmfao: :lmfao: :lmfao:
what other bigger things for this site are we talking about :D
let us know and we'll decide :)
lol,do u have a listQuote:
Originally Posted by Halfwit
anyway u can make it an option for cus words to appear or not?.. that would probably be ur best bet
This is an adult site and people should expect to see adult content. As long as new members join at the same rate and previous members stay on here, each site sponsor will have the same attn regardless of censorship. If anything the site sponsors should find the RLD more offensive than profanity. I just like the idea of being able to say ANYTHING, unlike in most other forums. If it comes down to loosing a sponsor then it's best to censor profanity, otherwise I vote no.
i mean, didnt we ban a bunch of underage kids a few months back?
Yeah, the under 18 = ban rule is in effect, but the problem is, how hard is it to hit the back button and change your birth date from 91 to 81? Answer it's not, and what Julio is talking about is bigger, better sponsors not wanting to do business with IA because of this. Like I said, teetotalling is NOT the way to go, but I do think the place could generally benefit from a little cleanup.Quote:
Originally Posted by changaroo
Don't get me wrong, I don't necessarily like the idea, but you have to weigh the benefits and detractors of the situation. That being said, if bigger, better sponsors doesn't equate to bigger, better things for us [the members] then by all means no, it's ridiculous.
Julio, you give us this site, you pay for it, So you make the call.. None of us should have a say. :goodjob:Quote:
Originally Posted by Julio
Go for it julio.. sponsors are more important that a couple of people bveing pissy cause they cant cuss
you own the site, so you call the shots. i personally find it a bit annoying when boards censor me, but thats just me.
..but while i still can...
SHIT! FUCK! ASS! COCKGOBBLER! BITCH! PISS! CUNT! PUSSY JUICE COCKTAIL! TAINT! RIM JOB! CLEVELAND STEAMER!
:D
i think its a great idea to appease your sponsors but if the website gets lame or boring whats the point of keeping you sponsors happy if you have no members...ie importsouth and importnorthcarolina..without members you have no sponsors
I'd have to agree with the J/O above me...
As a previous sponsor, the language and boards like "red light" are a bit scary..but that's what the "scene" is about. I made the decision that if we were going to sponsor the site, we would support the scene.
It comes down to the people. If you are sponsoring a site it's because you want your name or company associated with the target audience. As a sponsor it isn't smart to say "their good enough to buy my product" on one hand and on the other say "that's not the type of people we want our name associated with."
In reality, this site has a great target audience for products and vendors truly associated with the "scene"...
In my mind, your either in or out. You choose. The fact of the matter is, everyone knows that this site wasn't designed to make money, it wasn't the original thought. Chances are, that's what made it so popular. If people (members) begin to feel that they are just another group involved in a marketing study they will probably go elsewhere and without them, the members, what does sponsorship really matter?
Leave it alone...just my thoughts...
my take on this: First amendment but it is your site so im a lil torn. If its 18 and up i dont think a cleanup is necessary cuz its the nature of the beast we're gonna cuss period. Blanking it out may help but the point is would it be worth it to give up being to say what we want/sigs and such for money and eventually we'll be branding barcode on our heads..