I was reading an article which covered Washington D.C.'s attempt to reverse an earlier Supreme Court decision to REMOVE the city's 30yr "gun ban" laws. According to the city, it is "necessary" in order to maintain a rise in crime in the city.

Well, just out of curiosity I did a quick search and compared Washington's crime rate to that of Kennesaw who is a city that got widely publicized and more importantly criticized for having a polar opposite law in place where it's citizens are supposed to be armed and protect themselves.

Guess what I found? Check it out for yourselves:

http://www.areaconnect.com/crime/com...kennesaw&s2=GA

Ironic isn't it? That our nation's capital is one of the worst crime ridden city's in the whole country, all the while having THE toughest gun control laws in place for the last 30 yrs.

So let's all go thru this together now.....Guns kill people, so by making ownership of them "illegal" we clean-up our streets magically. Wait, let's give it a year.....maybe 10 yrs.....maybe even 30 yrs. Streets any safer just yet? Actually they are exponentially LESS safe because the ONLY ones that have guns are the criminals and police. Now, take the opposite end of the spectrum and implement "mandatory" gun ownership in every home and what happens??? Crime rate drops an astonishing 75% in just the first year....another 40 something % the very next year after that. Right now, Kennessaw averages 0.19 MURDERS PER YEAR. I wonder why that is.....

Anyway, I know that most of IA is against gun control, but for those that STILL think guns kill people or somehow make crime worse.......yall are all nuts.