Quote Originally Posted by FrnkPwrs
Damn. Im watching the news on 2 right now. Its going into the story about his case. Damn. Hung jury, 8 to 4 in his favor for the first trial. He got another girl pregnant, break up, both him and the rape accuser gets new partners. Possible the girl threatened rape out of jealousy? Ive seen it happen before. Im thinking this guy just snapped. Facing life in jail for something he possibly didnt do? Guy loses faith in the system [especially since its said in this thread he used to be a cop]? Im thinking he may be going for an insanity plea to avoid the death sentence. LOL, better him snapping instead of Kobe!
You're doing it again Frank. There's a saying that fits this well. You're trying to find the cat's 5 tails. If you dig long enough, you can always string along enough "maybe's" to make up a conspiracy theory out of any situation. That's life.

Just like life is also about facts. There were facts that were not admitted into the first trial that were into the second. Didn't read that too? This is one of the reasons Mr. Nichols has been quoted, in many different places, as telling the prosecutor DURING the second trial that she was "doing a much better job". Facts are that he tied up that ex for 3 days against her will. Facts that he broke into her place to commit that crime.

Fact is that people want everything to be both ways. Give me my day in court, but if I don't get the outcome my way I go nuts and kill everybody. You either have to accept the system or not. It was his choice to defend himself.

I find it hard to believe that a bunch of jinjangs like us in a public car forum are suddenly gonna un-earth a great conspiracy theory that ATTORNEYS obviously didn't see or they would have brought it to light since the first trial. This is specially true when WE don't even know half as many facts as they all do. They've seen the evidence already. Why didn't they cry conspiracy too? That kind of thing, IMO, would have a far better and easier time to prove than the ole "I didn't do it" defense. Don't you?

Reporters are sensationalizing the story for ratings. They too are looking for the cat's 5 tails sorta speak. All they have to find is one shred of anything that remotely shows anything and suddenly they'll have 100 people like you buying into it.

Bottomline? If he wasn't guilty before, he is now. End of story. What else needs to be analyzed besides how not to let it happen again?