
Originally Posted by
Big J
My whole thought is on how to conduct the "war" is to actually play like it's war.
Establish a 5 mile no-man zone at the border, and declare the boarder closed and anyone caught comming across the border or leaving the country at any point other than a checkpoint will be shot. Close the fucking border and leave some bodies to show you mean it, 0 tolerance. The country isn't even secure as far as foregin nationals getting involved and smuggling weapons in.
Declare an intent to disarm the population and set a dead line. Anyone caught with weapons other than a pistol for personal protection will be detained or summarily executed as the situation dictates, the property where the weapons were found would be seized and demolished, the US army may not be able to carry this out, but acting along side of the Iraqi forces, the Iraqi forces could carry it out. This would cause the weapons to move because moderates would be forced to decide if it's worth it to hold stashes for insurgents. If weapons are moving you can find and track them. You would more clearly polarize the population into those who want to fight and those who don't.
The situation is too out of hand to play nice. Playing it like it is now will ensure it drags on forever with little change in sight. We might make more enemies playing hard, but it's what the situation dictates as far as conducting a proper war. Don't go to war wearing kid gloves, you're going to piss people off, your not going to win over the people, so make them choose sides and......... then conduct a war as such.
my $.02