Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 48

Thread: Hillary at her best.....

  1. #1
    Proud to be Retrosexual Jaimecbr900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,189
    Rep Power
    37

    Default Hillary at her best.....

    I know we have a political section, but it doesn't get as much traffic as the WL does. Just wanted to see if ANYONE agreed with crazy woman here.

    Heard about this this morning, so I had to look into it because it sounded too cooky to be true. Unfortunately, it is true.

    This is a portion from her speech yesterday:

    "The Democrats know what needs to be done. Again, we're working trying to try push this agenda forward. The other day the oil companies reported the highest profits in the history of the world. I want to take those profits and I want to put them into a strategic energy fund that will begin to fund alternative, smart energy; alternatives and technology that will begin to actually move us toward the direction of independence."


    Ummm, she wants to WHAAAAA????? "TAKE"???? The PROFITS???? Of a legit company???? For what????? Kidding, right??? Unfortunately, not so.

    This is the great white female hope for President???? Wow!!!

    Discuss.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Omicron PERCI 8
    Age
    42
    Posts
    3,647
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Fascism @ it's finest. and here's the thing:

    the very people(shareholders) she talking to and will probally vote for her will be the one's getting screwed. Retires will lose millions in savings b/c the value of the "Evil Oil" companies stock will fall then the same people will want the gov't to bail them out. Democrats will blame different "Rich People" and the viscious will continue to spin.

    "Remember children, the gov't knows how to spend and save your money better than you do."

    Note: Hitler and the Nazi party came to power via the same means. Jews=Oil Companies and here came the gov't scapegoating them and solving the problem by "looking out" for the people.
    www.fairtax.org
    Quote Originally Posted by kelly
    True. But where's my sig?!! (lol)

  3. #3
    EX Super Mod TIGERJC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Fayetteville
    Age
    37
    Posts
    9,499
    Rep Power
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
    I know we have a political section, but it doesn't get as much traffic as the WL does. Just wanted to see if ANYONE agreed with crazy woman here.

    Heard about this this morning, so I had to look into it because it sounded too cooky to be true. Unfortunately, it is true.

    This is a portion from her speech yesterday:

    "The Democrats know what needs to be done. Again, we're working trying to try push this agenda forward. The other day the oil companies reported the highest profits in the history of the world. I want to take those profits and I want to put them into a strategic energy fund that will begin to fund alternative, smart energy; alternatives and technology that will begin to actually move us toward the direction of independence."


    Ummm, she wants to WHAAAAA????? "TAKE"???? The PROFITS???? Of a legit company???? For what????? Kidding, right??? Unfortunately, not so.

    This is the great white female hope for President???? Wow!!!

    Discuss.
    There is no way she could just take the oil companies profits away. She would have to increase taxes on the oil companies, which would screw us (the consumer) more than those greddy oil companies.
    2006 Evo IX - Bolt ons

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Omicron PERCI 8
    Age
    42
    Posts
    3,647
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    1 more thing.

    the "Ignorant Masses" don't understand the difference between PROFITS and PROFIT MARGINS. the Democrats know that(b/c their the 1's running the schools) and they exploit it.
    www.fairtax.org
    Quote Originally Posted by kelly
    True. But where's my sig?!! (lol)

  5. #5
    RIP Leisa! The Yousef's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Woodstock
    Age
    40
    Posts
    23,188
    Rep Power
    47

    Default

    capitalism ftl....LOL
    Val RIP
    Quote Originally Posted by Halfwit
    my only rule in life
    1: NEVER UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, DATE A GIRL OFF IA, OR TELL A GIRLFRIEND ABOUT IA.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Omicron PERCI 8
    Age
    42
    Posts
    3,647
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TIGERJC
    There is no way she could just take the oil companies profits away. She would have to increase taxes on the oil companies, which would screw us (the consumer) more than those greddy oil companies.
    if she was President and with a democratically controlled congress she could.

    and you are correct.
    www.fairtax.org
    Quote Originally Posted by kelly
    True. But where's my sig?!! (lol)

  7. #7
    EX Super Mod TIGERJC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Fayetteville
    Age
    37
    Posts
    9,499
    Rep Power
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by {X}Echo419
    1 more thing.

    the "Ignorant Masses" don't understand the difference between PROFITS and PROFIT MARGINS. the Democrats know that(b/c their the 1's running the schools) and they exploit it.
    Its funny how u generalize everything, but both sides have their own nut jobs
    2006 Evo IX - Bolt ons

  8. #8
    Proud to be Retrosexual Jaimecbr900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,189
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    The irony is that most shareholders in large Oil companies are not oil tycoons. It is generally retirement/401k/mutual funds. Which in turn means that average Joe's like teachers, policemen, firemen, etc will be the one's fitting the bill if she were to "take" any profits from Exxon/Mobil. The majority of her "followers" couldn't even put those two things together let alone see her for what she really is.....a socialist.

    What bugs me is: Last time I checked we were supposed to be a "free" country, right? Exactly what is "free" about EARNING a profit, only to have the gov't TAKE it from you to fund some cock and bull agenda???

    I'm just glad that she is like Kerry....open mouth, insert foot....in PUBLIC.

    Guilliani just threw his hat in the ring. Maybe he will make some sense for the Democratic party. Maybe.

  9. #9
    WANTS TO GO FAST! 2.0civic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    your moms house
    Posts
    14,183
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
    The irony is that most shareholders in large Oil companies are not oil tycoons. It is generally retirement/401k/mutual funds. Which in turn means that average Joe's like teachers, policemen, firemen, etc will be the one's fitting the bill if she were to "take" any profits from Exxon/Mobil. The majority of her "followers" couldn't even put those two things together let alone see her for what she really is.....a socialist.

    What bugs me is: Last time I checked we were supposed to be a "free" country, right? Exactly what is "free" about EARNING a profit, only to have the gov't TAKE it from you to fund some cock and bull agenda???

    I'm just glad that she is like Kerry....open mouth, insert foot....in PUBLIC.

    Guilliani just threw his hat in the ring. Maybe he will make some sense for the Democratic party. Maybe.
    INDEED
    FUCK B&D COMMUNICATIONS!


  10. #10
    Proud to be Retrosexual Jaimecbr900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,189
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TIGERJC
    There is no way she could just take the oil companies profits away. She would have to increase taxes on the oil companies, which would screw us (the consumer) more than those greddy oil companies.

    That's not what SHE thinks.

    The problem is not really her selling it....it's ignorant people buying it.

    This is where voters need to THINK a little ahead of their own two feet before voting for a nut job like her. She tries to sell this Robin Hood theme of taking from the rich to give to the poor. The one's buying it are the ones looking for a hand out from her, so of course they're gonna cheer about that. Problem is not just that they're looking for a hand out. Problem really is that they are shooting themselves in the foot for buying into that without thinking about, "well.....where exactly is this money gonna COME FROM...???". Ummm, YOUR pocket genius.

    Corporate America is not and should not fit the bill everytime a politician goes up to a podium to talk about social reforms. Corporate America is about one thing: "Buy low, sell high". Simple economics. Competition sets the pricing. Consumers set the volume. Smart strategies set the future profits.

    Enter politicians.

    Now they want to come in and TAKE from companies that have made smart business decisions and pay their investors/stock holders for those smart decisions only to throw that hard earned money into a bottomless pit called socialized welfare. Nothing wrong with that? Then go vote Democrat at the next election. That's their mentality and mindset.

    What's next? Taking YOUR property by force??? Hmmmm, how is that much different than this??? Not a far leap at all. Actually, it looks like a logical step to them. Look it up. See who orchestrated some of the largest property acquisitions FOR the "gov't" and their interests. Why? More property taxes=more money to spend.

    That's a whole other subject though.

  11. #11
    EX Super Mod TIGERJC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Fayetteville
    Age
    37
    Posts
    9,499
    Rep Power
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900

    What's next? Taking YOUR property by force??? Hmmmm, how is that much different than this??? Not a far leap at all. Actually, it looks like a logical step to them. Look it up. See who orchestrated some of the largest property acquisitions FOR the "gov't" and their interests. Why? More property taxes=more money to spend.

    That's a whole other subject though.
    They already do that. If it benefits the gov't in anyway, they could seized you propery for fair market value
    Last edited by TIGERJC; 02-06-2007 at 10:41 AM.
    2006 Evo IX - Bolt ons

  12. #12
    Proud to be Retrosexual Jaimecbr900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,189
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TIGERJC
    They already do that. If it benefits the gov't in anyway, they could seized you propery for fair market value
    You're absolutely correct.

    The catch is.....guess WHO sets "fair market value"????

    THAT is the real problem with Eminent Domain. They knock on your door and offer you peanuts because they have a developer itching to turn your 1 house/1 tax bill into 10 houses/10 tax bills, so the gov't is all for that. If you don't take those peanuts for your property, they can condemn the property and later take it. So you're either gonna take a little now or even less later. Good choices, eh?

  13. #13
    Back in GA Bajjani's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Buckhead, GA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    3,262
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    Q. Hillary is on a sinking boat. Who gets saved?


















    A. The nation.

    Of course I own this.
    IT PUTS THE OREOS ON THE RIM

  14. #14
    WANTS TO GO FAST! 2.0civic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    your moms house
    Posts
    14,183
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bajjani
    Q. Hillary is on a sinking boat. Who gets saved?


















    A. The nation.
    HAHAHHAHAHAHAAHGQ I JUST ABOUT SPILLED MY COKE
    FUCK B&D COMMUNICATIONS!


  15. #15
    Back in GA Bajjani's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Buckhead, GA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    3,262
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steveo
    HAHAHHAHAHAHAAHGQ I JUST ABOUT SPILLED MY COKE
    lol
    that would have been pretty funny to see

    Of course I own this.
    IT PUTS THE OREOS ON THE RIM

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Omicron PERCI 8
    Age
    42
    Posts
    3,647
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TIGERJC
    Its funny how u generalize everything, but both sides have their own nut jobs
    how can you talk about the "general" public without "generalizing"?
    both sides do have nut jobs. but you're making 2 mistakes. 1. you assume I am a republican. I am not, I have no affilation with any party. 2. this thread is about Hillary not some republicans too.
    www.fairtax.org
    Quote Originally Posted by kelly
    True. But where's my sig?!! (lol)

  17. #17
    Senior Member | IA Veteran  OneSlow5pt0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Buslengths behind you
    Age
    35
    Posts
    13,406
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    its gonna be bad if she wins....Iraq will be worse off when she takes over..because she will pull the troops and Iraq will crumble

  18. #18
    Proud to be Retrosexual Jaimecbr900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,189
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HypnoToad
    its gonna be bad if she wins....Iraq will be worse off when she takes over..because she will pull the troops and Iraq will crumble
    I just don't see how anyone would even contemplate voting for her. The only reason she's even an issue is because she's the only woman that's made even a slight dent towards the white house. There again, why is it even a remote possibility that she would win??? Because people don't vote for her based on her double talk. They vote just to vote.

  19. #19
    Senior Member | IA Veteran  OneSlow5pt0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Buslengths behind you
    Age
    35
    Posts
    13,406
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
    I just don't see how anyone would even contemplate voting for her. The only reason she's even an issue is because she's the only woman that's made even a slight dent towards the white house. There again, why is it even a remote possibility that she would win??? Because people don't vote for her based on her double talk. They vote just to vote.
    if she wins,its because all the women in the USA,voted for her,id vote for rep. anyways

  20. #20
    Proud to be Retrosexual Jaimecbr900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,189
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HypnoToad
    if she wins,its because all the women in the USA,voted for her,id vote for rep. anyways
    Not necessarily. There are plenty of men in the Democratic party, although I use that term loosely...

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Omicron PERCI 8
    Age
    42
    Posts
    3,647
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
    Not necessarily. There are plenty of men in the Democratic party, although I use that term loosely...
    I got my dog nutered and now it's a Democrat. we argue all the time. he wanted heart worm pills and I said that I can't afford them b/c I got F'd on my taxes.
    www.fairtax.org
    Quote Originally Posted by kelly
    True. But where's my sig?!! (lol)

  22. #22
    Senior Member | IA Veteran  OneSlow5pt0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Buslengths behind you
    Age
    35
    Posts
    13,406
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
    Not necessarily. There are plenty of men in the Democratic party, although I use that term loosely...
    yea,but we dont even know whos gonna run rep. yet...but since the whole usa has turned democrat seems like,she probly will win

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Omicron PERCI 8
    Age
    42
    Posts
    3,647
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HypnoToad
    yea,but we dont even know whos gonna run rep. yet...but since the whole usa has turned democrat seems like,she probly will win
    I thought R.Guilanni(sp) was a republican?
    www.fairtax.org
    Quote Originally Posted by kelly
    True. But where's my sig?!! (lol)

  24. #24
    Back in GA Bajjani's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Buckhead, GA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    3,262
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    Turd sandwhich or giant douche

    Of course I own this.
    IT PUTS THE OREOS ON THE RIM

  25. #25
    Senior Member | IA Veteran  OneSlow5pt0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Buslengths behind you
    Age
    35
    Posts
    13,406
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bajjani
    Turd sandwhich or giant douche
    lol,South park FTW

  26. #26
    Proud to be Retrosexual Jaimecbr900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,189
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by {X}Echo419
    I thought R.Guilanni(sp) was a republican?
    Giuliani is a Republican and probably the only one that can keep Hillary out of office too.

    The only thing I don't like about Giuliani is he is pro gun control, although his state is one of the bloddiest in the nation WITH gun control laws in place.

  27. #27
    livin again collins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    chillin in the sloooo gtoooo
    Age
    40
    Posts
    16,604
    Rep Power
    42

    Default

    jamie, thats some scary sh*t, isnt it?

  28. #28
    Proud to be Retrosexual Jaimecbr900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,189
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by collins
    jamie, thats some scary sh*t, isnt it?

    Hillary being in office??? Yep.

  29. #29
    Privateer Racing!!
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Duluth,Ga
    Age
    46
    Posts
    5,730
    Rep Power
    30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
    You're absolutely correct.

    The catch is.....guess WHO sets "fair market value"????

    THAT is the real problem with Eminent Domain. They knock on your door and offer you peanuts because they have a developer itching to turn your 1 house/1 tax bill into 10 houses/10 tax bills, so the gov't is all for that. If you don't take those peanuts for your property, they can condemn the property and later take it. So you're either gonna take a little now or even less later. Good choices, eh?
    Not true, here in GA a case just went thru the suprem court. A City wanted to buy a certain flower shop out and give them 200k. The owners where willing to sell for 450k, the city didnt wanna pay so they took it all the way to supreme court and the flower shop won!!!!



    THE STORY
    Stockbridge gives up on eminent domain battle

    By ADD SEYMOUR JR.
    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
    Published on: 02/05/07
    Stockbridge officials say they will drop their two-year effort to condemn and seize a flower shop in the Henry city for a town center project.

    [Post comments below]

    Johnny Crawford/Staff
    Stockbridge officials wanted Mark and Regina Meeks' Stockbridge Flowers and Gifts property for a town center project

    The decision comes after last week's Georgia Court of Appeals ruling in a case that spurred the Legislature to tighten eminent domain laws in 2006. The law wasn't retroactive and did not apply in this case.

    "We're not going to appeal," Mayor R.G. Kelley said. "We look like we're beating our heads against the walls."

    Stockbridge officials wanted Mark and Regina Meeks' Stockbridge Flowers and Gifts property for a town center project that would give Henry's largest town a true downtown.

    City officials offered the Meeks money but balked at the couple's counteroffer.

    The two sides reached a deal instead for the city to buy the property and give the couple retail space in the new town center. But the city backed out of that deal and decided instead to use eminent domain laws to condemn and acquire the property.

    A Henry County judge ruled in 2006 that the city went too far in using eminent domain laws because it didn't prove the couple's property would be used for public purposes.

    The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed that ruling on Jan. 31.

    "It looks to me they didn't go by the law," Kelley said. "The city had a right to do this because it was going to be used for a government building."

    Now, Stockbridge officials say they'll just build around the flower shop, which is already surrounded by cleared land.

    "We were willing to work with them, but we're happy to keep our property," said Mark Meeks. "I don't think it'll affect us that much."


  30. #30
    Gods Chariot Vteckidd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Atlanta Centennial Park
    Age
    43
    Posts
    33,102
    Rep Power
    69

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
    Not necessarily. There are plenty of men in the Democratic party, although I use that term loosely...
    THATS SIG MATERIAL!
    Enterprise Data Resources- Ecommerce Project Manager
    -www.usedbarcode.net

  31. #31
    Proud to be Retrosexual Jaimecbr900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,189
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by B18c1Turboed
    Not true, here in GA a case just went thru the suprem court. A City wanted to buy a certain flower shop out and give them 200k. The owners where willing to sell for 450k, the city didnt wanna pay so they took it all the way to supreme court and the flower shop won!!!!



    THE STORY
    Stockbridge gives up on eminent domain battle

    By ADD SEYMOUR JR.
    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
    Published on: 02/05/07
    Stockbridge officials say they will drop their two-year effort to condemn and seize a flower shop in the Henry city for a town center project.

    [Post comments below]

    Johnny Crawford/Staff
    Stockbridge officials wanted Mark and Regina Meeks' Stockbridge Flowers and Gifts property for a town center project

    True, but that's only one story. Notice how the city tried to do exactly what I said and KNOW they do to get their hands on a piece of property they really want. These people had to fight for a long time to get them to do what's right. How many people do you think go thru that? The majority fall prey to strong arm tactics and cave in way before that ever happens. Good for those guys that fought and won. Unfortunately, they are part of the minority by far.

    It's funny, but notice how they were wanting to use Eminent Domain to get the property to build a "town center" (i.e. a shopping center ). That's kinda stretching it to say that a shopping center is for the good of the "public", don't you think?

    Again, see how the gov't can and does use a power that's not even a constitutional power to lay claim to someone's property whenever they see fit? Look how that echoes exactly what Hillary the Socialist Clinton is proposing to do to Exxon/Mobil.

  32. #32
    WheresClarenceBeeks? Leadfoot_mf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/fucking%2C_Austria
    Posts
    4,784
    Rep Power
    26

    Default

    reps to all i could.

    she is just scary.
    -IA MGMT is inappropriate.


  33. #33
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    35

    Default

    DAMMIT...this thread got my hopes up i thought someone was going to post that she passed away or got hit by an 18 wheeler or something.... :rant dammit!

  34. #34
    Proud to be Retrosexual Jaimecbr900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,189
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TransAxle
    DAMMIT...this thread got my hopes up i thought someone was going to post that she passed away or got hit by an 18 wheeler or something.... :rant dammit!

    Actually, that's like that joke someone posted a few days ago in here.


    Hillary and her driver are going down an old country highway when a old cow steps out in front of their car and they hit it.

    The driver gets out and walks up to the nearest farm house to tell the farmer they'd hit his cow and killed it.

    He doesn't come back for a long time. Finally when he does, he has his shirt all out, lipstick on all over his face, and smoking a fine Cuban cigar.

    Hillary asks, "so, what took you so long....what happened?".

    The driver said, "well....I just knocked on the door and when I told the farmer what happened he gave me a fine cigar to smoke, his wife started kissing me, and his twin daughters took me out back and we had wild kinky sex.."

    Hillary says, "well, that's odd. What did you say to him?"

    The driver replies, "I just told him that I was Hillary Clinton's driver and I'd just killed the old Heffer.....everything else after that happened so fast....."


  35. #35
    Duck of Death ShooterMcGavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    right behind you...
    Age
    42
    Posts
    24,836
    Rep Power
    52

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
    I know we have a political section, but it doesn't get as much traffic as the WL does. Just wanted to see if ANYONE agreed with crazy woman here.

    Heard about this this morning, so I had to look into it because it sounded too cooky to be true. Unfortunately, it is true.

    This is a portion from her speech yesterday:

    "The Democrats know what needs to be done. Again, we're working trying to try push this agenda forward. The other day the oil companies reported the highest profits in the history of the world. I want to take those profits and I want to put them into a strategic energy fund that will begin to fund alternative, smart energy; alternatives and technology that will begin to actually move us toward the direction of independence."


    Ummm, she wants to WHAAAAA????? "TAKE"???? The PROFITS???? Of a legit company???? For what????? Kidding, right??? Unfortunately, not so.

    This is the great white female hope for President???? Wow!!!

    Discuss.
    i think ur taking the meaning of "take" there a little too literally. i think what she's trying to say is, regulate the oil industry so they can't continue to have record setting profits yr after yr, then let the money "saved" go to this alternative fund. now of course, u are still taking away their profits in some sense, just not directly dipping into their banks and taking it

  36. #36
    Proud to be Retrosexual Jaimecbr900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,189
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shagwAg3n
    i think ur taking the meaning of "take" there a little too literally. i think what she's trying to say is, regulate the oil industry so they can't continue to have record setting profits yr after yr, then let the money "saved" go to this alternative fund. now of course, u are still taking away their profits in some sense, just not directly dipping into their banks and taking it
    The word "take" has over 100 possible meanings according to the dictionary. Not a single one of those describes what you are trying to say.

    BTW, the oil industry is already regulated. Even using your example, how do you justify TAKING/using/diverting ANY funds from ANY company's EARNED profits INVOLUNTARILY to go to ANYTHING?

    Why can't they continue to make profits? Why not? That is WHY they are in business, isn't it? Who is to say that Oil Companies are NOT ALLOWED to make profits? What's next? Mom and pop bakeries? Tire shops? What gives the gov't ANY right to regulate PROFITS???? Find anywhere in the constitution or any state law which gives the gov't the right to TAKE any PROFITS away from you for any reason. Find it. Then why should she be allowed to propose to TAKE any from oil companies?

    Do you know what a profit margin is? What do you think is the typical profit margin for most major U.S. corporations? What do you think the typical profit margin for FINANCIAL institutions is? What was Exxon/Mobil's profit margin AFTER that $39 billion?

    Bush is under a perpetual media microscope. He farts, it's on the 12, 3,4,5,6,10, and 11 o'clock news. Hillary proclaims she's going to TAKE money from a company to do what SHE thinks they should do with THEIR profits, and you barely get a blurb in the newspaper. Funny how that works.

    The Socialist way of thinking is uber gay, period.
    Last edited by Jaimecbr900; 02-07-2007 at 10:05 AM.

  37. #37
    Duck of Death ShooterMcGavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    right behind you...
    Age
    42
    Posts
    24,836
    Rep Power
    52

    Default

    lolol i can't tell if ur really pro bush or really anti hilary

  38. #38
    Duck of Death ShooterMcGavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    right behind you...
    Age
    42
    Posts
    24,836
    Rep Power
    52

    Default

    btw, not making excuses, just stating how it sounds to me. i didn't say it was right anywhere in my post, nor do u have to agree

  39. #39
    Proud to be Retrosexual Jaimecbr900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,189
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shagwAg3n
    lolol i can't tell if ur really pro bush or really anti hilary
    I'm actually anti-stupidity.

    Bush has made some moves as of late that have me wondering where the hell his head is at too.

    Hillary just gets under my skin with all this BS she spouts and then all these nutswinging liberal idiots clap and validate every stupid thing that comes out her mouth just because she's who she is. That's gay.

  40. #40
    Duck of Death ShooterMcGavin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    right behind you...
    Age
    42
    Posts
    24,836
    Rep Power
    52

    Default

    ok gotcha, if hilary gets elected i'm moving back to communist china

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!