Quote Originally Posted by Vteckidd View Post
His policy of giving UE benefits to everyone for 5 years, without reproach, and stimulus spending.
What are you measuring this policies failure against?


He is arguing that people dont want UE checks, while arguing that we need to give people UE checks. FOR 99 WEEKS, 5 YEARS AFTER A RECESSION ENDED
Still not sure what is contradictory.

Is it unfathomable that someone would rather be employed than take UE benefits, and the benefits themselves still have a stimulus effect? Not sure how the two are exclusive.


The argument is why are we doing it for 99 weeks in the first place?
Why not?