Quote Originally Posted by Vteckidd View Post
Ok so someone explain this to me more, Im just sick and tired of reading the biased crap from both sides......

So , Paul Ryan, who is supposed to be this budget hawk, agrees to a budget that spends MORE and adds MORE to the deficit than before? Why didnt we just leave everything as is? I Mean if our goal is to reign in Govt Spending which is clearly out of control, why cave on a budget like this? We just increased spending on both DEF and NON DIS spending? WTF was the point ?
What does "out of control" mean to you?